Pass the Adobe Certified Expert AD0-E725 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Magento uses the materialized view (mview) system to track database changes and trigger automatic updates to indexers.

B (mview) is correct because it enables Magento to automatically detect data changes and update indexers incrementally.

A (observer) is not reliable for large indexing operations and not the recommended method.

C (database triggers) are discouraged and not used in Magento’s indexing mechanism.

The correct approach is Virtual types.

Virtual types allow developers to configure existing classes with different constructor arguments and create multiple variations of the same class without modifying the core or legacy code.

Preferences (C) would replace one class with another entirely, which could break the legacy functionality.

Constructor arguments (A) are part of DI but don’t allow multiple variants of the same class like virtual types do.

Adobe Commerce provides a built-in Upgrade Compatibility Tool (UCT) that allows developers to check for potential code incompatibilities before performing a version upgrade.

The UCT:

Analyzes the current codebase against the target upgrade version.

Reports on deprecated classes, methods, and APIs that could break during the upgrade.

Produces a compatibility report (HTML/CSV/JSON) that can be shared with customers as part of the upgrade plan.

This tool is specifically designed to help developers assess upgrade risks and is the official Adobe Commerce-recommended method for preparing upgrade assessments.

Option A (SWAT): The Site-Wide Analysis Tool provides performance, configuration, and health insights, but it does not analyze code compatibility for upgrades.

Option B (minimum system requirements): This ensures the environment is technically capable of running the new version but does not provide insights into custom code and extension compatibility.

Official Documentation Extracts:

“The Upgrade Compatibility Tool helps you identify potential issues in your custom code when upgrading to a new Adobe Commerce release. It scans your codebase and produces a report highlighting possible code changes that may be required.”— Adobe Commerce DevDocs: Upgrade Compatibility Tool

“Run bin/magento upgrade:compatibility:report to generate the upgrade compatibility report. The report provides details about deprecated and removed code, APIs, and incompatibilities.”— Adobe Commerce CLI Reference

To securely access services (such as MySQL, Redis, Elasticsearch) running in Adobe Commerce Cloud, developers must use the tunnel feature. The correct command is:

magento-cloud tunnel:open

This opens a secure tunnel from the local machine to the remote cloud environment services.

A is incorrect; there is no cloud:tunnel:connect Magento command.

B is incorrect; service:connect is not a valid Cloud CLI command.

C is correct.

Adobe Commerce B2B includes a native "Payment on Account" module, which is part of the B2B suite. This module allows customers with company accounts to place orders on account (credit).

A (repurpose COD) is a hack and not recommended.

C (create new payment method) is unnecessary since Adobe Commerce already includes this B2B feature.

B is correct: simply enable the native B2B Payment on Account module.

Adobe Commerce API caching (including GraphQL and REST) works only for idempotent requests such as HTTP GET.

C (POST) and D (PUT) are not cacheable because they are used for creating or updating resources.

A (GET) is cacheable.

B (HEAD) is technically idempotent, but not commonly used in Adobe Commerce APIs.

Out of the box, Adobe Commerce does not support per-attribute ACL permissions. ACL resources can restrict access to API endpoints or modules, but not individual product attributes.

Therefore, to restrict access to a specific attribute like external_service_id, the developer must implement custom permission control logic.

A is incorrect: ACL works at module/controller/service contract level, not per attribute.

C (plugin) could work but is not the correct principle-driven answer, as it is a workaround rather than attribute-level permission management.

In Adobe Commerce Cloud, simply creating a Git branch locally does not automatically create a corresponding Cloud environment. The correct way is to use:

magento-cloud environment:branch

This ensures the environment is created in Cloud, builds automatically, and is linked to the new Git branch.

B redeploys an existing environment but does not create one.

C is just another Git command and does not activate the environment.

In Magento, if any block within the page layout is marked cacheable="false", the entire page becomes non-cacheable. This means that full-page caching (FPC) will be disabled for all pages containing that block.

Option A is incorrect: cacheability is applied at the page level, not per block.

Option C is misleading; cacheable blocks remain cacheable only if no non-cacheable blocks are present.

Adobe Commerce Cloud deployments can cause downtime if static content deployment happens during the deploy phase (when the site is live).

The recommended best practice is to move static content deployment to the build phase by configuring it in magento.env.yaml. This ensures static assets are generated before deployment, enabling zero-downtime deployments.

A is incorrect: deployment strategies belong in magento.env.yaml, not the global app YAML file.

B is incorrect: there is no such checkbox in the Cloud console.

C is correct and aligns with Adobe best practices.