Pass the CIPS Level 5 Advanced Diploma in Procurement and Supply L5M1 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Conflict is common in organisations and in procurement, where competing priorities, supplier issues, and internal pressures often clash. TheThomas-Kilmann Conflict Modelidentifies five different approaches managers may use to handle conflict, depending on the situation and the desired outcome.

The first approach isCompeting (high concern for task, low concern for people). Here the manager asserts their own position to achieve quick results, even at the expense of relationships. For example, a procurement manager may insist on enforcing compliance with tendering rules despite stakeholder resistance. This is effective in crises but can harm morale if overused.

The second isAccommodating (low concern for task, high concern for people). In this style, the manager prioritises relationships by giving way to the other party’s needs. For instance, a procurement manager might accept a stakeholder’s preferred supplier to maintain goodwill, even if it is not the cheapest option. This preserves harmony but risks poor business outcomes if used too often.

The third approach isAvoiding (low concern for both task and people). Here, the manager withdraws from the conflict or postpones action. This may be appropriate when the issue is minor or when emotions are high, giving time for reflection. However, in procurement, avoiding conflict with a poor-performing supplier may worsen problems over time.

The fourth isCollaborating (high concern for both task and people). This involves working with others to find win-win solutions. For example, a procurement manager may work with finance and operations to balance cost, quality, and sustainability objectives in supplier selection. This is often the most effective approach but requires time and trust.

Finally,Compromising (medium concern for task and people)involves each side giving up something to reach a middle ground. For instance, a procurement manager may agree to split supplier contracts between two stakeholders’ preferences. This provides quick solutions but may leave all parties partially dissatisfied.

Conclusion:

A procurement manager can approach conflict through competing, accommodating, avoiding, collaborating, or compromising. Each has strengths and weaknesses. The best managers adapt their style depending on the importance of the issue, the urgency of the decision, and the relationships involved. In procurement, collaboration often delivers the most sustainable results, but flexibility across all five approaches is key.

The lifecycle of a group is often described usingTuckman’s Five Stages of Group Development. This model explains how groups evolve over time, moving from initial formation to effective performance. The five stages are as follows:

1. Forming:

At this stage, the group is coming together for the first time. Members are polite, cautious, and uncertain of their roles. There is little conflict, but people look to the leader for guidance. For example, a new procurement project team might be established to source a new supplier. At this point, roles are unclear, and members rely on the manager to set objectives.

2. Storming:

As individuals begin to assert themselves, conflict often emerges. Differences in working styles, personalities, or priorities can lead to tension. In procurement, this might involve disagreements between finance and operations about whether to prioritise cost savings or quality. The leader’s role here is to manage conflict and keep the team focused on objectives.

3. Norming:

Once conflicts are resolved, the group begins to establish shared norms, values, and ways of working. Roles and responsibilities become clearer, and collaboration improves. In a procurement context, the team may agree on supplier evaluation criteria and work more cohesively to achieve sourcing outcomes.

4. Performing:

The group is now fully functional and works effectively towards its goals. Members trust each other, communication flows well, and productivity is high. For example, the procurement team may now run tendering processes efficiently, negotiate with suppliers, and deliver strong results with minimal supervision.

5. Adjourning (or Mourning):

When the task is complete, the group disbands. This can cause feelings of loss for members who valued the team, but it also creates an opportunity to reflect on lessons learned. In procurement, this could involve completing a sourcing project, closing supplier contracts, and disbanding the cross-functional team after a lessons-learned review.

Conclusion:

The five stages of group development – forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning – describe how teams evolve over time. Understanding this lifecycle helps managers support their teams at each stage, managing conflict in storming, reinforcing collaboration in norming, and maximising results during performing. In procurement, applying Tuckman’s model ensures that cross-functional teams move quickly from formation to high performance, delivering greater value to the organisation.

One widely used model for classifying stakeholders isMendelow’s Power-Interest Matrix. This model categorises stakeholders based on their level of power (ability to influence decisions) and their level of interest (degree of concern in the issue). It helps managers decide how to engage with different stakeholders effectively.

High Power / High Interest – Key Players:These stakeholders must be closely managed and fully engaged. For example, the Finance Director or Hospital CEO when approving a high-value purchase. Procurement should provide detailed briefings, involve them in decision-making, and ensure their concerns are addressed.

High Power / Low Interest – Keep Satisfied:These stakeholders can influence outcomes but may not have strong interest in day-to-day procurement. For instance, regulatory bodies or legal advisors. Procurement should provide concise updates and ensure compliance to avoid dissatisfaction.

Low Power / High Interest – Keep Informed:These stakeholders care about the outcome but have limited influence. For example, end-users of medical equipment or nurses in a hospital setting. Procurement should communicate progress, seek feedback, and maintain transparency.

Low Power / Low Interest – Minimal Effort:These stakeholders require only basic information. For example, general staff not directly impacted by a procurement decision. Simple updates or summaries are enough to keep them engaged.

When communicating about ahigh-value purchase, the Procurement Function should tailor its communication strategy according to this classification. Key players (high power, high interest) must be involved early with full transparency, including risk assessments and supplier evaluations. Stakeholders with high interest but low power should be consulted to build trust and buy-in, while those with high power but low interest should receive enough information to stay satisfied. Procurement should also ensure consistent, professional communication that reflects the importance of the purchase and builds confidence in the process.

Conclusion:

Mendelow’s Power-Interest Matrix provides a structured way to classify stakeholders. By adapting communication to each category – managing key players, keeping others satisfied or informed – the Procurement Function ensures effective stakeholder engagement, minimises resistance, and gains approval for high-value purchases.

When major change is introduced, employees often experience strong emotions. TheChange Curve, based on Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s grief model, describes the stages staff may go through when faced with organisational change.

The first stage isShock/Denial. The procurement assistants may initially resist the idea of e-procurement, insisting that the paper-based system “has always worked.” Sayed should communicate openly about why the change is needed and provide clear facts about its benefits.

The second stage isAnger/Resistance. Staff may feel threatened, fearing loss of control or concern that they will not have the skills to manage digital systems. They may complain or openly resist. At this point, Sayed should listen empathetically, address concerns, and provide reassurance that training and support will be available.

The third stage isExploration/Acceptance. Gradually, staff begin to see potential benefits, such as less paperwork and faster processes. Curiosity grows, and employees start experimenting with the new system. Here, Sayed should encourage participation, offer pilot training, and allow staff to test the system in a safe environment.

The fourth stage isCommitment/Integration. Once staff feel competent and confident, they fully adopt the change. At this stage, Sayed should reinforce the success, recognise achievements, and celebrate improvements, such as reduced errors or faster ordering.

How Sayed Should Act:

Communicate clearly– explain why digitalisation is important (efficiency, accuracy, competitiveness).

Provide training and support– ensure assistants feel capable of using the new e-procurement tools.

Involve the team– allow staff to give feedback on system design or pilot trials to increase buy-in.

Be empathetic and patient– acknowledge fears and provide reassurance during resistance.

Reinforce success– highlight early wins and show how the change benefits both the team and the organisation.

Conclusion:

The team is likely to experience stages of shock, anger, exploration, and eventual commitment as they move through the change curve. Sayed must act as a supportive leader by communicating openly, offering training, involving staff, and recognising progress. This approach will help the team transition smoothly to e-procurement and ensure the change is successful.

The Taylorism school of thought, also known asScientific Management, was developed byFrederick Winslow Taylorin the early 20th century. It aimed to improve efficiency and productivity by applying systematic, scientific methods to the management of work. Its key principles can be summarised as follows.

The first principle is thescientific study of work. Taylor rejected traditional “rule of thumb” methods, instead advocating time-and-motion studies to identify the most efficient way of completing tasks. This broke jobs into smaller, measurable steps.

Secondly, Taylor emphasised thedivision of labour and specialisation. Workers should focus on narrowly defined tasks, allowing them to become faster and more efficient, similar to parts in a machine.

Thirdly, he argued forscientific selection and training of workers. Instead of leaving workers to train themselves, managers should select the right person for the job and provide formal training in the “one best way” to complete tasks.

Fourthly, Taylor stressedmanagerial control and supervision. He believed management should plan, organise and set methods, while workers should focus on carrying them out. This created a strong separation between planning and execution.

Finally, Taylor promotedfinancial incentives as motivators. He assumed that workers are primarily motivated by pay, so piece-rate systems and performance-based rewards were used to encourage higher output.

Taylorism brought many benefits, such as increased productivity, efficiency, and predictability in mass production industries. However, it also attracted criticism for treating workers like machines, reducing autonomy, and ignoring social and psychological needs. From a modern procurement perspective, its ideas are still visible in standardised processes such as purchase-to-pay systems, KPIs, and efficiency-driven shared services. However, organisations today often balance these principles with more human-centred approaches to motivation and teamwork.

In conclusion, the key principles of Taylorism were scientific analysis of work, specialisation, scientific selection and training, strict managerial control, and financial incentives. While its focus on efficiency shaped early management thinking, modern leaders must also consider motivation, empowerment, and adaptability to achieve sustainable success.

Part A – Knowledge Transfer (10 points):

Knowledge transfer refers to the process of sharing skills, experience, insights and information from one person or group to another within an organisation. It ensures that valuable expertise is not lost and that best practice can be replicated. This can happen formally, such as through training, mentoring, or documented procedures, or informally, through conversations, collaboration, and shared experiences. In procurement, knowledge transfer might involve senior buyers passing negotiation tactics to junior colleagues or documenting supplier performance insights in a shared database.

Part B – Ensuring Strong Knowledge Management (15 points):

Managers play a key role in creating systems and cultures that support knowledge sharing. Some ways include:

Creating knowledge repositories– using databases, intranets, or category management playbooks where information is stored and accessible to all team members.

Encouraging mentoring and coaching– pairing experienced staff with new employees helps transfer tacit knowledge that may not be written down.

Promoting collaboration and teamwork– cross-functional project teams and regular knowledge-sharing meetings spread expertise across functions.

Using technology– collaboration platforms (e.g., SharePoint, Teams) allow procurement staff to record supplier insights, lessons learned, and contract data in real time.

Rewarding knowledge sharing– recognising and incentivising individuals who share expertise encourages a culture of openness rather than knowledge hoarding.

Embedding learning in processes– after-action reviews, lessons-learned sessions after supplier negotiations or tenders ensure experiences are captured systematically.

Leadership behaviours– managers must role-model transparency and collaboration, showing staff that sharing knowledge is valued.

Conclusion:

Knowledge transfer is about ensuring that critical experience and expertise are shared across the organisation. Managers can ensure strong knowledge management by combining systems, processes, and culture – from IT tools and databases to mentoring and recognition. In procurement, effective knowledge management helps avoid repeated mistakes, builds stronger supplier relationships, and improves decision-making across the team.

Procurement plays a central role in engaging with different stakeholders. Effective collaboration ensures efficiency, compliance, and value creation. The way procurement collaborates can vary depending on the stakeholder group. Two examples aresuppliersandother departments within the organisation.

Collaboration with Suppliers:

Procurement must develop strong relationships with suppliers to ensure continuity of supply, cost efficiency, and quality. This involves activities such as contract negotiation, performance monitoring, and supplier relationship management (SRM). Collaboration often focuses on building trust, sharing forecasts, and working on joint initiatives like innovation or sustainability. For example, in a manufacturing firm, procurement may collaborate with a fabric supplier to develop new eco-friendly materials. The relationship can be transactional for routine items or strategic for high-value, critical suppliers.

Collaboration with Other Departments:

Internally, procurement must work closely with functions such as Finance, Operations, and Marketing. Collaboration ensures that procurement strategies align with organisational needs. For example, Finance may require procurement to manage budgets and compliance, while Operations depends on procurement for timely materials. Collaboration may involve cross-functional teams, joint decision-making, and regular communication. For instance, procurement and product development may work together to source innovative materials that match design requirements.

Comparison:

Both collaborations require trust, open communication, and alignment of goals.

With suppliers, collaboration often focuses externally on securing value and innovation. With internal departments, it focuses on aligning procurement activity with business objectives.

Supplier collaboration may involve formal tools like contracts, KPIs, and SRM frameworks, whereas internal collaboration relies more on teamwork, communication, and shared processes.

Contrast:

Suppliers are external stakeholders, so procurement must manage risks, legal compliance, and negotiation dynamics. Internal departments are internal stakeholders, requiring influence, persuasion, and partnership.

Supplier collaboration aims at building long-term external relationships; internal collaboration ensures smooth workflows and organisational efficiency.

Conclusion:

Procurement collaborates with both suppliers and internal departments, but the focus differs. Supplier collaboration is about external value creation and innovation, while internal collaboration is about aligning processes and achieving organisational goals. Successful procurement professionals adapt their approach to meet the needs of each group while ensuring overall business success.

Part A – Embedding Learning into the Culture (5 points):

Embedding learning into the organisational culture means creating an environment where continuous learning and development are valued and encouraged. In Tania’s case, this is vital because the team has had no formal training, which contributes to low skills and low morale. A learning culture ensures employees feel supported in developing new abilities, reduces resistance to change, and prepares staff for future challenges. For procurement, this could involve training on negotiation skills, supplier relationship management, or e-procurement tools.

Part B – Role Congruence (5 points):

Role congruence means ensuring that an individual’s skills, experience, and abilities match the tasks they are assigned. At present, some staff are being asked to complete tasks they are not comfortable with, which lowers confidence and morale. Aligning people’s roles to their capabilities improves job satisfaction, builds confidence, and enhances performance. For example, a staff member skilled in analysis should be allocated spend analysis tasks, rather than being pushed into high-pressure supplier negotiations without support.

Part C – Actions Tania Should Take (15 points):

Training and development programmes– introduce structured training to close knowledge gaps and give staff confidence in their roles.

Role review and alignment– assess individual skills and reassign tasks to match strengths, ensuring role congruence.

Mentoring and coaching– pair experienced staff with less experienced members to support learning and build capability.

Encourage continuous learning– build learning into team culture through workshops, lunch-and-learns, and reflection sessions after projects.

Regular performance reviews– provide feedback, set development goals, and celebrate progress to improve motivation.

Empowerment and involvement– involve staff in identifying training needs and improvement ideas to increase ownership.

Recognition and morale building– acknowledge achievements to rebuild confidence and team spirit.

Conclusion:

Embedding learning into the culture ensures that development is continuous, reducing skills gaps and raising confidence. Role congruence ensures that tasks match people’s abilities, improving morale and performance. For Tania, focusing on training, role alignment, coaching, and recognition will rebuild her procurement team into a skilled, motivated, and high-performing unit.

Individuals learn in different ways, and managers must understand these methods to develop their teams effectively.

One method isformal learning, such as classroom courses, e-learning, or qualifications like CIPS. This gives structured knowledge and ensures consistency, but it may lack immediate workplace application.

A second method ison-the-job learning, where skills are developed through daily tasks, job rotation or shadowing. This is practical and tailored to the workplace but may be inconsistent without good supervision.

A third approach isexperiential learning, based on Kolb’s cycle of experience, reflection, conceptualisation and testing. For example, a buyer may learn negotiation skills by practising in a live supplier meeting, reflecting on performance, and then improving.

Another method issocial learning, as described by Bandura. Individuals learn by observing and modelling others’ behaviour. In procurement, junior staff may observe how senior colleagues manage supplier relationships and copy effective practices.

Finally, there isself-directed learning, where individuals take initiative through reading, research or online courses. This builds independence but requires strong personal motivation.

In contrast, formal learning is structured and standardised, while experiential and social learning are more practical and situational. On-the-job learning blends practice with support, whereas self-directed learning provides autonomy but less guidance. Most organisations use a mix of these methods to ensure balanced development.

One important factor that influences learning is an individual’slearning style. According to Honey and Mumford, some people areactivists(learn best by doing), others arereflectors(learn by observing and thinking),theorists(prefer analysing concepts), orpragmatists(want to apply ideas in practice). For example, in procurement training, an activist may benefit from a role-play negotiation, while a theorist may prefer studying sourcing models before application. Managers who recognise learning styles can tailor development activities to individual preferences, making learning more effective.

In conclusion, individuals can learn through formal, on-the-job, experiential, social, or self-directed approaches, each with strengths and weaknesses. Learning effectiveness depends on personal factors such as style, and managers who understand these differences can create development opportunities that are both motivating and productive.

Part A – What is needed for a group to be effective (15 points):

For a group to be effective, several conditions must be in place.

Firstly, the group must haveclear objectives and purpose. Without shared goals, members may pull in different directions, leading to inefficiency.

Secondly,strong leadershipis needed to guide the group, set direction, and balance concern for people with concern for tasks. Leadership provides motivation and resolves conflicts.

Thirdly,good communicationensures information is shared openly, problems are raised quickly, and collaboration is smooth. In procurement, this means buyers, finance, and operations align on sourcing decisions.

Fourthly, groups needdefined roles and responsibilities. Clarity prevents duplication of work and ensures accountability. For example, one person may manage supplier contracts while another handles negotiations.

Finally,trust and cooperationare essential. When group members respect and support each other, they are more willing to share knowledge, take risks, and commit to decisions. Psychological safety is key to team performance.

Part B – Importance of different roles in a group (10 points):

It is important that each person plays a different role within the group. According toBelbin’s Team Roles theory, groups are more effective when individuals contribute complementary strengths. Roles may include “Shapers” who drive action, “Plants” who bring creativity, “Implementers” who turn plans into reality, and “Monitor Evaluators” who provide critical analysis.

If everyone in the group plays the same role, important skills may be missing. For example, a procurement team made up entirely of “Shapers” may generate energy but lack careful analysis, leading to poor supplier selection. Conversely, a balanced team ensures creativity, organisation, and delivery are all present.

Conclusion:

For a group to be effective, it needs clear goals, leadership, communication, defined roles, and trust. It is also important that members bring different strengths and roles, as this diversity improves problem-solving and ensures the group performs to its full potential.