Pass the Confluent Certified Administrator CCAAK Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Event stream processing involves the transformation, filtering, enrichment, and joining of data as it streams through Kafka. Kafka provides two core technologies for this:

Kafka Streams: A client library for building applications and microservices that process and analyze data stored in Kafka.

ksqlDB: A SQL-based interface for building real-time applications that run continuous queries on Kafka streams.

From Confluent documentation:

“Kafka Streams and ksqlDB are the primary technologies for stream processing on Kafka.”

Schema Registry (A) provides schema storage and validation.

Confluent Replicator (D) is used for mirroring topics across clusters, not processing.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 7, p. 211–222

Confluent Docs: ksqlDB Overview and Kafka Streams Developer Guide

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

For maximum throughput and lowest latency, the setting acks=0 allows the producer to send messages without waiting for any acknowledgment from the broker. This increases speed but at the cost of durability.

From Kafka documentation:

“acks=0: The producer does not wait for any acknowledgment from the broker. The message can be lost but offers the highest throughput.”

A → Correct: Maximizes throughput with no delivery guarantee.

B → Balanced option but not max throughput.

C → Offers strongest durability but lowest throughput.

D → Invalid configuration.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 5, p. 158–159

Apache Kafka Documentation: Producer Configs – acks

Event stream processing is ideal for real-time and near-real-time scenarios. Kafka Streams and ksqlDB are commonly used in use cases requiring immediate reaction to data.

A → Correct: Fraud detection systems benefit from low-latency anomaly detection.

B → Correct: Real-time product recommendations based on user activity require continuous processing.

C → Incorrect: End-of-day processing is batch-oriented, not real-time.

D → Correct: Real-time alerting and log anomaly detection are classic streaming use cases.

E → Incorrect: Historical dashboards rely on batch aggregation and are not continuous processing.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 7, p. 210–215

Confluent Documentation: Use Cases for Kafka Streams and ksqlDB

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka architecture maintains exactly one active Controller at any given time, regardless of the number of brokers. The Controller is responsible for administrative tasks like partition leader election and topic creation. The remaining brokers are replicas, ready to take over if the Controller fails.

From Kafka documentation:

“At any given time, there is only one active controller in the Kafka cluster.”

Even in a cluster with 4 brokers, only 1 broker acts as the Controller.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 6, p. 189

Apache Kafka Documentation: Controller Role Description

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka Replicator does not preserve source cluster offsets. Offsets in the destination DR cluster are generated independently, and there is no guarantee they match those from the source cluster.

From Confluent Replicator documentation:

“Replicator does not guarantee preservation of message offsets between source and destination. Offsets in the destination cluster are newly assigned.”

C → Correct: Offsets may differ even for the same data.

A → Incorrect: Lag is not the issue if offsets inherently differ.

B → Misleading: Kafka does not overwrite committed messages.

D → Invalid: Kafka messages are immutable; no "update" happens.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 10, p. 313

Confluent Replicator Documentation: “Offset Mapping and Limitations”

When a broker is shut down gracefully:

It flushes data from memory to disk to avoid log recovery upon restart.

It also notifies the controller to reassign leadership of the partitions it leads, ensuring high availability.

From Kafka documentation:

“A graceful shutdown will first flush logs to disk and then hand over leadership of partitions to ensure minimal disruption.”

C → Incorrect: Leader election happens only when the controller detects broker loss; it’s not guaranteed on restart.

D → Incorrect: Partition rebalancing is not automatic on broker restart unless manually initiated.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 10, p. 306

Apache Kafka Documentation: Graceful Shutdown Behavior

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka does not enforce a single compression format per topic or partition. Each producer can independently choose whether to compress its messages and what compression type to use (e.g., gzip, snappy, lz4). These compressed messages coexist with uncompressed ones in the same topic.

From Kafka documentation:

“Producers can individually configure compression settings. Kafka stores messages in the format they are received, so compressed and uncompressed messages can exist in the same partition.”

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 5, p. 164–165

Apache Kafka Documentation: Producer Config – compression.type

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka relies on ZooKeeper heartbeats to track broker health. If the broker JVM is unresponsive due to long GC pauses, ZooKeeper won’t receive timely heartbeats and will mark the broker as dead.

From Kafka Documentation:

“If the garbage collection pause is too long, the broker will not send heartbeats to ZooKeeper and will be considered dead. Leadership and partition reassignments will then occur.”

B → Correct: Broker marked dead, causes partition leadership transfers.

A → Incorrect: Log cleaner thread is unrelated to JVM pauses.

C → Incorrect: Clients may be impacted, but this is not the first result.

D → Incorrect: This is a normal OS function, not caused by GC issues.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 10, p. 305

Kafka Official Docs: "ZooKeeper Timeout and Broker Health"

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Kafka’s default authorizer implementation is the SimpleAclAuthorizer, which stores ACLs in ZooKeeper and reads them on each access.

From Kafka documentation:

“Apache Kafka includes an out-of-the-box authorizer implementation that stores ACLs in ZooKeeper.”

A → RBAC is Confluent-specific and not stored in ZooKeeper.

B → Correct: Built-in ACL mechanism uses ZooKeeper.

C → Ranger is an external plugin, not bundled with Apache Kafka.

D → LDAP is used for authentication, not authorization.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 9, p. 285

Apache Kafka Documentation: ACLs and Authorizers

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

When sizing a ksqlDB cluster, the following factors are crucial:

A. Data Schema: Complex schemas may require more CPU/memory for serialization/deserialization.

B. Number of Queries: Each persistent query consumes system resources (CPU, memory).

C. Number of Partitions: Determines parallelism and state store scalability.

From Confluent documentation:

“Cluster capacity planning depends on schema complexity, query concurrency, and partition count.”

D → Incorrect: Encryption impacts producer/broker, not ksqlDB sizing directly.

E → Incorrect: Retention is managed by Kafka, not ksqlDB.

Page Reference:

Kafka: The Definitive Guide, 1st Edition, Chapter 7, p. 225–229

Confluent ksqlDB Documentation: Capacity Planning Guidelines

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾