Pass the Fortinet Network Security Expert NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

From the exhibits:

The firewall policy has Application Control enabled and uses certificate-inspection for SSL inspection.

The application sensor has Application and Filter Overrides with the following order (priority):

Excessive-Bandwidth with action Block

Google (vendor filter) with action Monitor

In FortiOS, Application and Filter Overrides are evaluated by priority (top-down). The first matching override is applied. If traffic matches an earlier override with Block, it will be blocked even if a later override would Monitor/Allow it.

Why Google apps fail while www.fortinet.com works:

Many Google applications can be detected as (or can trigger) the Excessive-Bandwidth behavior/signature depending on the specific service and traffic pattern.

Because Excessive-Bandwidth (Block) is above Google (Monitor), Google-related traffic may match the first rule and be blocked before the Google override is evaluated.

Access to www.fortinet.com works because that traffic is not matching the Excessive-Bandwidth override.

Therefore, to resolve:

B. Move up Google in the Application and Filter Overrides section to set its priority higher

This ensures Google matches the Google override before any broader blocking override is applied.

E. Set the action for Google in the Application and Filter Overrides section to Allow

This explicitly permits Google applications once the higher-priority match occurs (stronger than Monitor for troubleshooting and ensuring access).

Why the other options are not the best fit here:

A (deep-content inspection) can help identify more HTTPS applications, but the exhibit already shows a specific Google override configured; the immediate issue is the override evaluation order and action.

C relates to Web Filter URL categories, but the problem is occurring under Application Control behavior/vendor overrides.

D (flow-based) is not required to fix an override priority/action conflict.

With full SSL inspection, FortiGate performs a man-in-the-middle process: it decrypts the HTTPS session, inspects it, then re-encrypts it. To do this, FortiGate presents a substitute certificate to the client, signed by the CA certificate configured in the SSL/SSH inspection profile (for example, Fortinet_CA_SSL or a custom enterprise CA).

Browsers will show certificate warning errors when the issuing CA is not trusted by the client device/browser trust store. This only happens for HTTPS because certificates are used in TLS; HTTP has no certificate exchange, so no warning appears.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A: Allowing invalid server certificates affects whether FortiGate blocks/permits connections to sites with bad certs; it does not fix the client warning about FortiGate’s substituted cert.

B: Proxy vs flow inspection mode does not inherently cause certificate warnings; the warning is about trust of the signing CA.

D: Missing extensions is not the typical reason across “any HTTPS website”; the standard reason is the client does not trust the FortiGate inspection CA

Based on the FortiOS 7.6 Authentication and User Group documentation, the correct answer is A.

Meaning of “Include in every user group” (FortiOS 7.6)

When configuring a RADIUS server on FortiGate, enabling Include in every user group has a very specific and documented effect:

The configured RADIUS server object is automatically added to all FortiGate user groups.

As a result, any user who successfully authenticates against that RADIUS server becomes a valid member of every FortiGate user group, unless additional group filtering (such as RADIUS attributes) is applied.

This simplifies configuration when the same external authentication source must be accepted across multiple firewall policies that reference different user groups.

This behavior is explicitly described in the FortiOS 7.6 Administrator Guide under RADIUS authentication servers and user groups.

Why Option A is Correct

FortiGate user groups can include:

Local users

LDAP servers

RADIUS servers

Enabling Include in every user group causes FortiGate to:

Insert the RADIUS server into all existing and future FortiGate user groups

Therefore, all users authenticating via this RADIUS server are implicitly allowed in every FortiGate user group.

This is exactly what option A describes.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

B: FortiGate does not push users or groups into the RADIUS server. Authentication is always initiated by FortiGate toward RADIUS.

C: FortiGate does not manage or modify RADIUS-side group definitions.

D: LDAP and RADIUS user groups are separate authentication mechanisms; this setting does not merge or affect LDAP groups.

The exhibit shows the output of the following command:

diagnose test application ipsmonitor 1

pid = 2044, engine count = 0 (+1)

0 - pid:2074:2074 cfg:1 master:0 run:1

How to interpret this output (FortiOS 7.6 – IPS internals)

ipsmonitor displays the status of IPS engines running on the FortiGate.

engine count = 0 means:

No IPS scanning engines are currently active

IPS is not processing any traffic

In FortiOS, IPS engines are started on demand.

Critical documented behavior

IPS processes are only spawned when at least one firewall policy is configured with an IPS profile and traffic matches that policy.

If no firewall policy references an IPS profile, the IPS engine:

Does not start

Shows engine count = 0

Appears “not working,” even though the IPS profile exists

This is exactly what the diagnose output indicates.

Why option A is correct

A. There is no firewall policy configured with an IPS security profile.

Creating an IPS profile alone is not sufficient

IPS must be applied to an active firewall policy

Traffic must match that policy for the IPS engine to run

Otherwise, ipsmonitor will show engine count = 0

This matches FortiOS 7.6 IPS operational behavior.

Why the other options are incorrect

B. Administrator entered the command diagnose test application ipsmonitor 5.

Incorrect.

The exhibit clearly shows ipsmonitor 1

Using a different argument would not explain engine count = 0

C. FortiGate entered into IPS fail open state.

Incorrect.

In fail-open, IPS engines may be bypassed, but they still initialize

engine count = 0 specifically indicates IPS is not in use at all

D. Administrator entered the command diagnose test application ipsmonitor 99.

Incorrect.

The command argument affects debug level, not engine creation

Again, the exhibit shows ipsmonitor 1

Based on the FortiOS 7.6 Administrator Guide regarding Fortinet Single Sign-On (FSSO) polling modes, the agentless polling mode has specific technical characteristics:

SMB Protocol Usage (Statement B is True):

In agentless polling mode, the FortiGate unit itself acts as the collector.

It establishes direct connections to the Windows Domain Controllers (DCs) using the SMB (Server Message Block) protocol, typically over TCP port 445, to read the Windows Security Event logs.

This allows FortiGate to parse login event IDs (such as 4768 and 4769) to identify users and their corresponding IP addresses without needing an external collector agent installed on a server.

Workstation Check Support (Statement C is True):

One of the primary limitations of the agentless polling mode compared to the agent-based mode is the lack of workstation verification.

In agentless mode, FortiGate does not perform "workstation checks" or "dead entry checks". This means it cannot proactively verify if a user is still logged into a specific workstation after the initial logon event is recorded, which can lead to stale entries if a user logs off without a corresponding event being captured.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: In agentless mode, FortiGate (the FSSO daemon) performs the collection itself; it does not use the AD server as a "collector agent" in the functional sense of FSSO architecture.

Option D: While FortiGate uses LDAP to retrieve group membership information once a user is identified, it does not "direct" a collector agent to a remote LDAP server, as there is no external collector agent involved in this specific mode.

In FortiOS 7.6, when multiple dialup IPsec VPNs are configured on the same FortiGate—especially in Aggressive Mode—FortiGate must identify which Phase 1 configuration a connecting client should match.

How FortiGate selects a dialup IPsec tunnel

For dialup VPNs:

The remote peer (user or device) does not have a fixed IP address

Multiple Phase 1 interfaces may exist on the HQ FortiGate

FortiGate uses identifying information sent during IKE Phase 1 to select the correct tunnel

Aggressive Mode behavior

Aggressive mode sends ID information in clear text during Phase 1

This allows FortiGate to match incoming peers to the correct Phase 1 configuration

Why Peer ID is the correct answer

C. Peer ID

Peer ID (also called IKE ID) is used to:

Identify the remote peer

Differentiate between multiple dialup tunnels

Common Peer ID formats:

FQDN

User FQDN

Key ID

FortiGate matches the received Peer ID against the Phase 1 configuration to select the correct tunnel

This is the documented and recommended method for:

Mapping users to different department tunnels

Supporting multiple dialup IPsec VPNs in aggressive mode

Why the other options are incorrect

A. Local GatewayIdentifies the local FortiGate interface/IP, not the remote user.

B. Dead Peer DetectionUsed only for tunnel health monitoring, not tunnel selection.

D. IKE Mode ConfigUsed for assigning IP addresses and pushing settings, not for selecting the Phase 1 tunnel.

In FortiOS 7.6, when FortiGate is integrated with FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager, firewall policies rely on a Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) to ensure proper policy tracking, synchronization, and log correlation across devices.

Why the UUID is required

Every firewall policy in FortiOS has a UUID.

FortiManager uses the UUID to:

Track policies across managed FortiGate devices

Maintain policy consistency during installs and revisions

FortiAnalyzer uses the UUID to:

Correlate logs accurately to the correct firewall policy

Preserve log association even if policy order or policy ID changes

Without a UUID:

Policy-to-log mapping can break

FortiManager cannot reliably manage or synchronize policies

FortiAnalyzer log analysis becomes inconsistent

This is explicitly documented in Fortinet administration and logging architecture references.

Why the other options are incorrect

B. Policy IDPolicy ID can change when policies are moved and is not reliable for long-term correlation across FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer.

C. Sequence IDSequence ID reflects GUI ordering only and has no role in log correlation.

D. Log IDLog ID is generated per log event, not per firewall policy.

In FortiOS 7.6, firewall policies can be displayed in multiple views to help administrators understand and manage rules more effectively. The difference in ordering between Interface Pair View and By Sequence View is intentional and documented.

Why the policy order is different

Interface Pair View

Groups firewall policies based on the incoming (From) and outgoing (To) interfaces.

Policies are organized under interface pairs such as:

LAN → WAN

WAN → LAN

Within each interface pair, policies may appear reordered compared to the global list.

This view is designed for readability and troubleshooting, not to show execution order.

By Sequence View

Displays firewall policies in their actual evaluation (processing) order.

This is the top-down order FortiGate uses when matching traffic.

It reflects the real rule sequence that determines which policy is hit first.

Why option C is correct

C. Interface Pair View sorts policies based on matching interfaces, while By Sequence View shows the actual processing order of rules.

This statement exactly matches FortiOS behavior as documented in the FortiOS 7.6 Firewall Policy Views section of the Administrator Guide.

Why the other options are incorrect

A: Interface Pair View does not follow traffic logs, and By Sequence View is not based on “rule priority” grouping.

B: FortiGate does not dynamically reorder policies based on traffic patterns.

D: Security levels do not affect policy ordering in Interface Pair View.