Pass the iSQI Agile Technical Tester CTAL-ATT Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

In Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), scenarios are formulated to describe the general behavior of the system from the perspective of a specific user. This helps in understanding the user’s needs and how the system should respond. It’s important for scenarios to be clear and understandable to all stakeholders, including non-technical ones, which is why they are often written in simple language describing the behavior rather than the technical actions.

 In Agile projects, test cases may need to be refactored to improve their clarity and maintainability. This process makes the test cases easier to understand and cheaper to modify, which is essential in Agile environments where changes are frequent and rapid. Refactoring test cases ensures that they remain effective and efficient as the codebase evolves, allowing for quick adjustments in response to new requirements or changes in the system under test.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents emphasize the importance of refactoring test cases in Agile projects to maintain their effectiveness and efficiency1.

 A good practice in test automation for a regression-averse approach is to increase automated test coverage. This allows the team to ensure that as many features as possible are being tested automatically, which can help in identifying regressions early. Moreover, by automating the regression tests, testers can dedicate more time to exploratory testing, which is crucial for discovering issues that automated tests may not catch. Exploratory testing is an approach that relies on the tester’s creativity and experience, and it is an essential complement to automated regression testing123.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and the resources available at Software Testing Help emphasize the importance of comprehensive test automation in Agile environments. They suggest that increasing automated test coverage is beneficial for maintaining software quality and allowing testers to focus on exploratory testing, which is a critical aspect of a thorough testing strategy45678.

Quantitative questionnaires are best suited for eliciting non-functional requirements from a large number of stakeholders. This is because they allow for the collection of measurable, statistical data that can be analyzed to understand the stakeholders’ needs regarding system qualities like performance, usability, and reliability. These questionnaires can be designed to include specific questions about non-functional aspects, which can then be quantitatively assessed to inform the acceptance criteria1.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus and study resources emphasize the importance of understanding and defining both functional and non-functional requirements in Agile environments. They outline various elicitation techniques that can be used to gather these requirements, including the use of questionnaires for collecting quantitative data23.

Story Mapping is a requirements engineering technique that provides a visual representation of the user journey within the system. It helps in identifying how different user groups interact with the system, thereby uncovering gaps and inconsistencies in user stories. This technique allows teams to prioritize and plan releases based on the user’s experience and needs.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester syllabus and training materials discuss the use of various requirements engineering techniques, including Story Mapping, to better understand and define user interactions with the system12.

 The term ‘isolated’ in the context of unit testing refers to the practice of testing a unit of code in isolation from other units. This means that the test should only cover the functionality of the unit it is designed to test, without any interactions with other units or systems. This isolation helps to ensure that the test is focused, reliable, and not affected by external factors, making it easier to pinpoint the source of any issues that arise.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents outline the principles of unit testing, including the importance of isolation to ensure that each test is targeted and effective12.

 Option D is written in correct Gherkin format and is appropriate for the User Story. It clearly states the precondition (three Purchase Orders with a total value of £21.75 have been placed), the action taken by the Purchasing Manager (requesting the list of Purchase Orders placed this month), and the expected outcome (the 3 orders and their total value of £21.75 are displayed). This scenario directly addresses the Purchasing Manager’s desire to see a list of all Purchase Orders placed so far this month with their total value, which aligns with the User Story’s goal of controlling the amount of money being spent.

References = ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and Training resources12.

 In the context of Agile Technical Testing, when a test class fails, the immediate next step is to repair the failing code. This aligns with the Agile principle of fast feedback and continuous improvement. The failing test indicates that the current implementation does not meet the specified criteria, hence the need to correct the code. Once the code is repaired, it should be re-executed to verify that the test now passes, ensuring that the validation criterion is met.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester materials emphasize the importance of quick iterations and prompt responses to test failures. This approach helps maintain the momentum of the development process and ensures that issues are addressed as soon as they are identified1

When creating a test charter for an exploratory test session, it’s important to consider the following: a) The user roles specified in the user stories are crucial as they determine the perspective from which the testing will be conducted. c) Ensuring the session fits within a 60 to 120 minutes time box is important for maintaining focus and efficiency. e) Understanding the actions performed by the user roles according to the acceptance criteria is essential for defining the scope of the testing.

These considerations are aligned with the ISTQB guidelines for Agile Technical Testing, which emphasize the importance of understanding user roles, maintaining efficient testing sessions, and ensuring that the acceptance criteria are met through the actions performed during testing12.

References = The ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester documents and training resources provide guidance on creating test charters and conducting exploratory testing sessions. They highlight the importance of focusing on user roles, session time management, and the actions required to meet the acceptance criteria12. Additionally, resources available at Software Testing Help offer practical insights into the application of these principles in real-world testing scenarios34.

The user story provided is quite broad and encompasses multiple functionalities, which suggests it is more of an epic than a small, deliverable user story. The INVEST criteria for Agile user stories require that stories be Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, and Testable. In this case:

Independent: This user story seems to have dependencies, as the ability to print the bill, view it in different currencies, and flag items are likely interconnected functionalities.

Negotiable: The user story provides specific solutions rather than outlining the problem to solve, which limits the negotiation on how to implement the solutions.

Valuable: The story does provide value to the hotel guest, which is clear.

Estimable: With the information provided, the development team can likely estimate the effort required.

Small: The story is not small; it covers multiple features that probably cannot be delivered in a single iteration.

Testable: The acceptance criteria are testable, although they are quite detailed and prescriptive.

References = The explanation is based on the INVEST criteria as described in Agile methodologies1234. The criteria are used to assess the quality of a user story, ensuring it is well-defined and suitable for Agile development practices. The user story in question does not fully meet the ‘Negotiable’ and ‘Small’ criteria, which is essential for maintaining flexibility and delivering incremental value in Agile projects.