Pass the Juniper JNCIP-DC JN0-683 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Symmetric IRB Routing with EVPN Type 2 Routes:

Symmetric Routing: In symmetric IRB (Integrated Routing and Bridging), routing occurs in both directions at the ingress and egress leaf nodes using the same routing logic. This is contrasted with asymmetric routing, where different routing logic is used depending on the direction of the traffic.

Required Components:

Option A:An L3 IRB interface is necessary for each VLAN that participates in routing, as it handles the Layer 3 processing for the VLAN.

Option B:MAC-VRF is required for symmetric routing to maintain a mapping of MAC addresses to the appropriate VRF, ensuring correct forwarding within the EVPN.

Option D:A transit VNI (Virtual Network Identifier) is required for each VRF to encapsulate the Layer 3 traffic as it traverses the network, allowing the IP traffic to be appropriately forwarded.

Conclusion:

Option A:Correct—Each local VLAN needs an IRB interface for L3 processing.

Option B:Correct—MAC-VRF is necessary for handling MAC address resolution in symmetric routing.

Option D:Correct—Transit VNIs are required for routing VRF-specific traffic across the network.

OptionsCandEare incorrect because:

C:Symmetric routing can work with various VLAN models, including single or multiple VLANs within an EVPN instance.

E:Symmetric routing is generally more efficient than asymmetric routing as it uses consistent routing logic in both directions.

In the provided network configuration, Host A is in VLAN 100 and Host B is in VLAN 200. The issue arises because these two hosts are unable to communicate, which indicates that either the interfaces are not properly linked to their respective VLANs, or there is a missing static route required for inter-VLAN routing.

Step-by-Step Analysis:

VLAN Assignment:

The exhibit shows that irb.200 is correctly associated with VLAN 200 in the configuration. However, there is no corresponding irb.100 for VLAN 100. Without irb.100, the network lacks the logical interface to handle routing for VLAN 100. Thus, adding irb.100 to VLAN 100 is necessary.

Command to solve this:

set vlans vn100 13-interface irb.100

Static Route Configuration:

For inter-VLAN routing to occur, a static route needs to be configured that allows traffic to pass between different subnets (in this case, between VLAN 100 and VLAN 200). The command set routing-options static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.168.200.10 would add a static route that directs all traffic from VLAN 100 to the correct gateway (192.168.200.10), which is necessary to route traffic between the two VLANs.

Command to solve this:

set routing-options static route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.168.200.10

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

Option A (delete vlans vn200 13-interface irb.200): This would remove the logical interface associated with VLAN 200, which is not desired because we need VLAN 200 to remain active and properly routed.

Option B (set interfaces irb unit 100 family inet address 192-168.100.1): This command would incorrectly assign an IP address that does not correspond with the subnet of VLAN 100 (192.168.200.1/24). This could create a misconfiguration, leading to routing issues.

Data Center References:

For a Data Center, proper VLAN management and static routing are crucial for ensuring that different network segments can communicate effectively, especially when dealing with separated subnets or zones like in different VLANs. This aligns with best practices in DCIM (Data Center Infrastructure Management) which stress the importance of proper network configuration to avoid downtime and ensure seamless communication between all critical IT infrastructure components.

Ensuring that the correct interfaces are associated with the correct VLANs and having the proper static routes in place are both essential steps in maintaining a robust and reliable data center network.

This detailed analysis reflects best practices as noted in standard data center design and network configuration guides​.

Understanding EBGP in an IP Fabric:

EBGP (External Border Gateway Protocol) is commonly used in IP fabrics to establish peering between routers, such as leaf and spine nodes, without relying on an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) like OSPF or IS-IS.

IGP Requirement for EBGP:

Option B:EBGP peering does not require an IGP for adjacency establishment. This is because EBGP peers are typically directly connected, and BGP establishes its own sessions without needing an underlying IGP.

Leaf-to-Spine Peering:

Option C:In a typical IP fabric, each leaf node establishes an EBGP session with every spine node. This ensures full connectivity between leaves and spines, facilitating efficient routing and forwarding within the fabric.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—EBGP does not require an IGP for establishing peering sessions.

Option C:Correct—Each leaf node peers with every spine node, which is a standard practice in IP fabrics to ensure connectivity and redundancy.

Understanding the Configuration:

The configuration shown in the exhibit involves an EVPN (Ethernet VPN) setup using BGP as the routing protocol. The export policy named CHANGE_NH is applied to the BGP group evpn-peer, which includes a rule to change the next hop for routes that match the policy.

Issue with Next Hop Not Changing:

The policy CHANGE_NH is correctly configured to change the next hop to 203.0.113.10 for the matching routes. However, the next hop remains unchanged when advertising EVPN routes to the peer 203.0.113.2.

Reason for the Issue:

In Junos OS, when exporting routes for VPNs (including EVPN), the next-hop change defined in a policy will not take effect unless the vpn-apply-export parameter is used inthe BGP configuration. This parameter ensures that the export policy is applied specifically to VPN routes.

The vpn-apply-export parameter must be included to apply the next-hop change to EVPN routes.

Correct Answer Explanation:

D. The vpn-apply-export parameter must be applied to this peer:This is the correct solution because the next hop in EVPN routes won't be altered without this parameter in the BGP configuration. It instructs the BGP process to apply the export policy to the EVPN routes.

Data Center References:

This behavior is standard in EVPN deployments with Juniper Networks devices, where the export policies applied to VPN routes require explicit invocation using vpn-apply-export to take effect.

Understanding the Output:

The show evpn database command output shows the MAC address, VLAN, active source, timestamp, and IP address associated with various hosts in the EVPN instance.

Analysis of the MAC Address:

Option A:The MAC address 40:00:dc:01:00:04 is associated with the IP address 10.4.4.5, as indicated by the output in the IP address column. This confirms that this host has been assigned the IP 10.4.4.5.

Option D:The active source for the MAC address 40:00:dc:01:00:04 is listed as 00:02:00:00:00:04:00:04:00:00:04:00:04, which indicates that the host is connected via an ESI (Ethernet Segment Identifier) LAG (Link Aggregation Group). This setup is typicallyused in multi-homing scenarios to provide redundancy and load balancing across multiple physical links.

Conclusion:

Option A:Correct—The host with MAC 40:00:dc:01:00:04 is assigned IP 10.4.4.5.

Option D:Correct—The host is originating from an ESI LAG, as indicated by the active source value.

Review of the Exhibit:

The exhibit shows the switch configuration for Leaf-1 and Leaf-2. The configurations include route distinguishers, VRF targets, and service IDs, all of which are crucial for ensuring proper operation in an EVPN-VXLAN environment.

Service-ID Consistency:

The service ID must be consistent across all participating leaf devices in the same EVPN instance to ensure that they are part of the same VXLAN overlay network.

VRF Target Consistency:

The vrf-target parameter must also be consistent across devices to ensure that VRFs (Virtual Routing and Forwarding instances) are correctly imported and exported between leaf nodes.

Conclusion:

Option B:Correct—Setting the same service-id on Leaf-2 ensures that it is part of the same VXLAN overlay as Leaf-1.

Option D:Correct—The vrf-target on Leaf-2 should match Leaf-1 to ensure consistent routing policies and proper route exchange.

VXLAN Traffic Verification:

To ensure VXLAN traffic from the xe-0/0/12 interface is correctly encapsulated by the logical vtep.32770 and sent to a remote leaf device, it is essential to monitor the relevant interface statistics.

The command show interfaces terse vtep.32770 statistics provides a concise overview of the traffic statistics for the specific VTEP interface, which can help verify whether traffic is being correctly encapsulated and transmitted.

Explanation:

This command is particularly useful for quickly checking the traffic counters and identifying any potential issues with VXLAN encapsulation or transmission.

It allows you to confirm that traffic is flowing as expected, by checking the transmitted and received packet counters.

Data Center References:

Monitoring interface statistics is a crucial step in troubleshooting and validating network traffic, particularly in complex overlay environments like EVPN-VXLAN.

Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP):

Juniper Networks' ZTP (Zero Touch Provisioning) process automates the deployment of new devices by allowing them to fetch and execute scripts for configuration and setup as they are powered on and connected to the network.

Supported Scripting Languages:

The Junos OS supports several scripting languages that can be used during the ZTP process:

Shellscripts are often used for general automation tasks.

Pythonis a widely supported language in Junos, offering powerful scripting capabilities for automating network tasks.

SLAX(Service Logic Execution Environment) is a scripting language specific to Junos, designed to automate configuration tasks and simplify network operations.

Conclusion:

Option D:Correct—Junos ZTP supports Shell, Python, and SLAX, making it the correct choice among the provided options.