Pass the OMG Certification OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Given that the system is inStateA1, the sequence of triggers that will move the system toStateCmust take into account the transitions and their associated triggers as defined in the UML state diagram. Starting fromStateA1, the triggera5will cause a transition withinStateA, followed bya6, which moves toStateA2. The triggera5is not relevant as it is an internal transition inStateA1. Then,a3(the exit action forStateA) anda2would be followed to leaveStateAaltogether. Once out ofStateA,a1is used to transition toStateB, wherea10is an entry action, not a trigger. Finally, to get fromStateBtoStateC, the triggersa11followed bya12are needed. This sequence of triggers reflects the correct usage of exit, entry, and transition triggers as defined by UML state machine semantics.

In the MOF class hierarchy, the class ‘Element’ sits at the top. It is the superclass of all classes defined in MOF and is an implicit superclass of all metaclasses defined using MOF1. This superclass relationship to ‘Element’ does not need to be explicitly declared in the metamodels.

In UML, modeling individual things (such as instances) involves making statements about them. Here are the details for each option:

A. A UML Model can contain individual things (e.g. Instances) UML does not prescribe the level of detail to be used in the description.

This statement is partially correct. UML models can indeed contain individual things (instances), but the level of detail is not explicitly prescribed by UML. However, the statement does not cover the possibility of incomplete or imprecise information.

B. A UML Model can contain statements about individual things If a thing is an instance of a Classifier, these statements must be consistent (all mandatory Properties must be defined, all Constraints must be satisfied).

While it is true that a UML model can contain statements about individual things (instances), the requirement for consistency (mandatory properties and constraints) is not explicitly mentioned in UML. Therefore, this option is not entirely accurate.

C. A UML Model can contain statements about individual things These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, and abstract, but not wrong.

This statement is also partially correct. UML allows for incomplete, imprecise, and abstract statements about individual things. However, it does not guarantee that these statements cannot be wrong.

D. A UML Model can contain statements about individual things. These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, may turn out to be wrong, or even be asserted as counterfactual.

This option provides a more accurate representation. UML allows for statements about individual things that can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, and even potentially incorrect. It acknowledges the uncertainty and variability in modeling individual things.

E. A UML Model can only contain statements about sets of individual things (e.g. Classifiers).

This statement is incorrect. UML models can contain statements about both individual things (instances) and sets of things (classifiers).

References:

UML 2.5.1 Specification

While the UML specification does not explicitly state the options, it provides the foundation for UML modeling principles and allows for flexibility in expressing statements about individual things.

Remember that UML is a modeling language, and its primary purpose is to capture and communicate information about systems and their components. The level of detail, precision, and correctness can vary based on the modeling context and the specific use case. Therefore, option D best reflects the UML approach to modeling individual things.

Please note that the information provided here is based on UML 2.5.1, and it’s essential to consult the official UML specification for the most accurate and up-to-date details.

In UML Sequence Diagrams, a "neg" (negative) combined fragment is used to specify invalid or forbidden interactions. Therefore:

A.Incorrect, because a "neg" fragment defines an invalid interaction, so following it by normal positive constructs does not affect its interpretation of invalidity.

B.Incorrect, as nesting a "neg" fragment within another "neg" fragment does not inherently result in valid traces.

C.Correct. Normal positive constructs followed by a "neg" fragment define some sequences of interactions as invalid, which is the intended use of the "neg" fragment.

D.Incorrect, because an "assert" fragment is used to specify required interactions, and containing a "neg" fragment within it does not make the invalid traces valid.

References:

UML Specification: Interactions section, particularly the explanation of combined fragments and their meanings.

The negative combined fragment and its semantics are discussed in the UML 2.5 Documentation, under the Sequence Diagrams and Combined Fragments sections.

In the sequence diagram 'GO', the event 'h receives x' is depicted before 'k sends q', as indicated by the solid arrow from 'g' to 'h' labeled 'x' and the dashed arrow from 'k' labeled 'q'. Since messages are processed in the order they are depicted from top to bottom, 'h' must receive 'x' before 'k' can send 'q'.

The other options (B, C, and D) cannot be determined to be always true based on the information provided in the diagram alone. Especially with asynchronous messages, the send event may occur before the corresponding receive event, and the diagram does not contain sufficient information about timing constraints or message processing durations to ascertain the exact ordering of these events.

References include:

UML 2.5 Specification (formal/2017-12-05), specifically the sections regarding message sends and receives, lifelines, and the semantics of sequence diagrams.

Introduction to UML 2 Sequence Diagrams by Scott W. Ambler, which provides insights into the interpretation of sequence diagrams and the flow of messages.

The UML sequence diagrams provided do not offer enough information to definitively determine the order of event occurrences. Sequence diagrams are used to show how objects interact in a given scenario, particularly the order of messages exchanged between objects. However, without a clear indication of the sequence or additional context, it’s impossible to ascertain which event occurs last.

In UML 2.x, sequence diagrams can be interconnected, but the execution order across separate diagrams is not inherently defined unless explicitly specified. Therefore, based on the information given, the answer is D, as we cannot uniquely determine the last event occurrence without additional details.

References:

OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Infrastructure Version 2.5

UML 2.x specifications and sequence diagram notations

The term “computationally complete” in the context of fUML refers to a subset of UML that is expressive enough to define models that can be executed automatically by a computer using an execution tool. This means that the subset includes all the necessary elements and constructs to specify the behavior of a system in a way that can be understood and run by a machine without further interpretation

In Option C, the propertiessuitable road surfaceandaverage speedhave been redefined in the subclassesRecumbent BikeandRacing Bike. The use of the{redefines}keyword in UML signifies that the subclass will provide its own specific values for these properties, overriding the general ones provided by the superclassBicycle. This is the correct way to enforce that each specialization ofBicyclehas a unique set of values for these attributes, as redefinition allows for the customization of inherited properties on a per-subclass basis. The use of{redefines}is specified in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, which describes how properties inherited from a superclass can be customized by subclasses.

The diagram depictsElectronic Device Kindas a class that requires a set of Certifications (required : Certification[1..*]). This implies that any subclass ofElectronic Device Kindmust provide a set of required Certifications because the multiplicity[1..*]indicates that at least one Certification is mandatory for each instance ofElectronic Device Kindor its subclasses. Therefore, when a subclass is created, it inherits the requirement to specify what Certifications are needed. This is a standard UML generalization, where the subclass inherits the attributes and constraints of its superclass. This interpretation is consistent with the rules defined in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, which includes the semantics of class generalization and attribute inheritance.

The compiled model resulting from the Action Language for Foundational UML (fUML) must have the equivalent effect as a model resulting from the mapping to fUML. In other words, the compiled model should behave in the same way as if it were directly executed using the fUML execution semantics