Pass the Salesforce Administrator Plat-Admn-301 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Validation rules and page layouts are two tools that can be used to require data to be entered in a field and improve data quality on a record in Salesforce. Validation rules are a way to enforce data quality and integrity by checking the values of fields before a record is saved and displaying an error message if the values do not meet the specified criteria. Page layouts are a way to control the layout and organization of fields, buttons, related lists, and other components on a record page. Page layouts can also make fields required so that users must enter a value before saving a record.

Debug logs capture database operations, system processes, and errors that occur when executing a transaction or running unit tests. Debug logs can help identify the cause of Apex CPU time limit exceeded errors by showing the execution time of each Apex statement and trigger. References: https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.apexcode.meta/apexcode/apex_debugging_debug_logs.htm

To add a user to an opportunity team, you need Edit access on the account associated with the opportunity and either own the opportunity or be above the owner in the role hierarchy. References: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.teams_adding.htm &type=5

A roll-up summary field is a type of field that calculates values from related records and displays them on the parent record. A roll-up summary field can be used to count, sum, min, or max values from child records. You can create a roll-up summary field on an object that has a master-detail relationship with another object. In this case, you can create a roll-up summary field on Room that counts the number of Equipment records related to it. References: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.fields_about_roll_up_summary_fields.htm &type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.fields_defining_field_types.htm &type=5

In this scenario, a Lookup relationship is the most appropriate choice for relating the Audit custom object to the Account object. This relationship allows for flexibility, especially when it comes to data retention and access control requirements, as outlined by AW Computing's security team.

Lookup Relationship:

A Lookup relationship links two objects, allowing records from the custom Audit object to be associated with the Account object. Unlike a Master-Detail relationship, it offers greater flexibility in terms of record ownership, sharing, and visibility controls, which is particularly useful for sensitive data.

The Lookup relationship will enable administrators to set specific permissions, ensuring that only the audit team has access to the records, as required.

Additionally, records in the Lookup relationship are independent. Therefore, if the Account record is deleted, the Audit record can persist, aligning with the need to retain Audit records for 10 years.

Preservation and Access Control:

Given the 10-year retention requirement, the independence of records under a Lookup relationship is ideal. It ensures that Audit records are not automatically deleted when an associated Account record is removed.

Access to Audit records can be restricted to the audit team by setting up custom sharing rules or permissions, which is achievable through the Lookup relationship's flexible sharing model.

Incorrect options:

Master-Detail: In a Master-Detail relationship, the detail (child) records are dependent on the master (parent) record. Deleting an Account would automatically delete any associated Audit records, which would conflict with the retention requirement.

Many-To-Many: This type of relationship involves a junction object to associate multiple records from both sides. It is not necessary in this case, as the requirement is a one-to-many relationship from Account to Audit records.

Self: A self-relationship would allow records within the Audit object to be related to each other. This does not apply to linking the Audit object to the Account object.

In conclusion, the Lookup relationship provides the necessary flexibility for data preservation and access control, making it the optimal choice for this requirement.

Building a process that updates the record type field to B2C Customer after conversion will correct this issue. The conversion layout for person accounts does not allow selecting different record types for accounts and contacts. The default record type for person accounts is determined by the organization-wide default settings. However, a process can be triggered after conversion to update the record type field based on the lead record type or other criteria. References: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.convert_leads_considerations.htm &type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.convert_leads_mapping.htm &type=5

When the feature for Contacts to multiple Accounts is enabled, a Contact can have a direct relationship with multiple Accounts. However, one of these relationships must be designated as the primary Account relationship. This relationship is required on a Contact regardless of the page layout settings and cannot be removed unless the Contact is deleted or merged with another Contact. References: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.shared_contacts_set_up.htm &type=5 https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.shared_contacts_considerations.htm &type=5

The Data Import Wizard is a tool that allows you to import data for standard and custom objects, including person accounts, into Salesforce. You can access it from the Setup menu and use it to import up to 50,000 records at a time. You can also use it to update, upsert, or delete existing records. The Data Import Wizard can help you match your data with Salesforce fields, prevent duplicates, and run import jobs in the background. References: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.data_importer.htm &type=5

One possible cause of unexpected changes to record values is having multiple automation tools that update the same field on the same object. This can create conflicts and overwrite each other’s values. To resolve this issue, the administrator should consolidate automation tools and use only one tool per object and field combination. This can help avoid confusion and ensure consistent results. References: https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.process_which_tool.htm &type=5 https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/content/learn/modules/business_process_automation/automation_considerations

To review the performance of a Lightning record page, administrators can utilize two key tools:

Lightning Usage App:

The Lightning Usage App provides insights into user engagement and performance metrics for Lightning Experience.

Within this app, administrators can view specific metrics related to page load times and other performance factors.

This is a helpful resource for tracking usage and identifying potential issues with page speed or performance across the org.

Analyze Button:

The Analyze button is available within the Lightning App Builder when editing a Lightning record page.

By clicking this button, administrators can run a performance analysis on the page layout, which provides specific recommendations for optimizing page load times and improving overall user experience.

The tool evaluates components, their configuration, and potential sources of delay, giving direct feedback on areas to improve.

These two options directly provide performance analysis capabilities for Lightning record pages. The other options listed do not offer direct access to page performance metrics:

Activation Button is used for setting page visibility rules and activating a page, not for performance analysis.

Pages Menu helps in navigating and managing pages but does not provide performance metrics.

Using both the Lightning Usage App and the Analyze button allows administrators to comprehensively review and optimize Lightning page performance for improved user experience.