Pass the Saviynt SCIP SAVIGA-C01 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

In Saviynt's SAML 2.0 based Single Sign-On (SSO) configuration, the "SP Entity ID" uniquely identifies Saviynt as the Service Provider (SP) to the Identity Provider (IdP). The correct SSO URL structure incorporates this "SP Entity ID" within a specific path.

Saviynt's URL Structure: Saviynt's SSO URLs follow a pattern to ensure proper routing and authentication. The /ECM/saml/SSO/alias/ portion is crucial for directing SAML-based login attempts.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. https://myorg.saviyntcloud.com/ECM/saml/SSO/SaviyntSP: This URL is missing the crucial "alias" segment in the path, making it invalid for SAML SSO.

B. https://myorg.saviyntcloud.com/SaviyntSP: This URL doesn't include the necessary components for SAML-based authentication within Saviynt.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: Saviynt's official documentation on configuring SAML SSO provides details on the correct URL structure and the significance of the "SP Entity ID."

Saviynt Support: Saviynt's support resources and knowledge base articles often address issues related to SSO configuration, reinforcing the correct URL format

To have multiple users as Campaign Owners for a User Manager Campaign in Saviynt, the appropriate configuration is to B. Create a user group and choose the user group as the Campaign Owner. Here's the explanation:

Saviynt's User Groups: User groups are collections of users that can be used for various purposes, including assigning roles, permissions, and ownership.

Campaign Owner as a User Group: Saviynt allows you to specify a user group as the owner of a campaign. This means that all members of the group will have the same campaign ownership permissions.

Benefits of Using a User Group:

Simplified Management: It's easier to manage a group of users than to assign individual users as campaign owners.

Flexibility: You can easily add or remove users from the group to adjust campaign ownership as needed.

Shared Responsibility: All members of the group share responsibility for managing the campaign.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Create a user Query and add users: While you can use queries to select users, directly using a user group is a more standard and manageable approach for assigning multiple campaign owners.

C. Create a Roles Query and add Roles of various users: Roles are typically used for granting access rights, not for defining campaign ownership.

D. Create an Organization Query and add users: Organization queries are related to the organizational structure and are not the best way to define a group of campaign owners.

In conclusion: Using a user group as the Campaign Owner in Saviynt provides a flexible and manageable way to assign multiple users as owners, simplifying administration and promoting shared responsibility for campaign management.

In Saviynt, a Campaign is best described as a D. Group of similar Certifications. Here's a breakdown:

Saviynt's Campaigns and Certifications:

Campaign: A container that defines the scope, schedule, participants, and other settings for a set of related access certifications.

Certification: The individual review task assigned to a Certifier (e.g., a manager reviewing their subordinates' access, an application owner reviewing users of their application).

Analogy: Think of a Campaign as a project, and Certifications as individual tasks within that project.

Purpose of Campaigns: Campaigns provide a structured way to manage and track access reviews, ensuring that they are conducted regularly and consistently.

Examples of Campaigns:

User Manager Campaign: Groups certifications where managers review their subordinates' access.

Entitlement Owner Campaign: Groups certifications where entitlement owners review who has access to their entitlements.

Application Owner Campaign: Groups certifications where application owners review who has access to their applications.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Group of similar Endpoints: Endpoints are systems or applications connected to Saviynt, not the primary grouping within a campaign.

B. Group of User Groups: User groups are collections of users, not the defining element of a campaign.

C. Group of Dashboards: Dashboards provide visualizations of data, but they are not the core component of a campaign.

In conclusion: A Campaign in Saviynt is essentially a container for a set of related access certifications, providing a framework for managing and organizing the review process based on specific criteria and objectives.

To implement a workflow involving a Saviynt User Group's approval, the appropriate workflow block is B. TASK Access Approve. Here's an explanation:

Saviynt's Workflow Engine: Saviynt's workflow engine allows for the creation of complex approval processes using various building blocks or activities.

TASK Access Approve: This specific activity is designed to handle approval steps within a workflow. It allows you to define who the approver(s) should be and how the approval should be processed.

User Group Approval: To implement approval by a Saviynt User Group, you would configure the "TASK Access Approve" activity as follows:

Approver Type: You would select "User Group" as the approver type.

User Group Selection: You would then specify the particular Saviynt User Group that should be responsible for the approval.

Approval Logic: You can define whether all members of the group must approve, or if a certain number or percentage of approvals is sufficient.

Saviynt User Groups: User Groups in Saviynt are collections of users, often based on department, role, or other criteria. They are useful for managing access and approvals at a group level.

Other Options:

A. CONDITION IF Else: This block is used for branching logic in a workflow, not specifically for assigning approvals to user groups.

C. Action Prompt: This might be used for displaying information or collecting input, but not for defining an approval step.

D. TASK Custom Assignment: While you could potentially use custom assignment with scripting to achieve user group approval, the "TASK Access Approve" activity provides a more straightforward and built-in way to do it.

In conclusion: The "TASK Access Approve" workflow block in Saviynt, configured with a User Group as the approver type, is the most appropriate and direct way to implement a workflow that requires approval from a specific Saviynt User Group.

User Account Correlation Rules in Saviynt are specifically designed to map imported accounts to existing users within the system. These rules define the logic for matching accounts to users based on various attributes, such as employee ID, email address, or username.

Why other options are incorrect:

Account to User Rule: This is not a standard rule type in Saviynt.

Account Name Rule: This might focus on naming conventions for accounts, not correlating them to users.

Technical Rule: This is a broader category of rules and doesn't specifically address account-user mapping.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The section on Account Correlation Rules provides detailed information on how to configure these rules for different scenarios.

Saviynt Use Cases: Saviynt often provides examples and use cases demonstrating how to use User Account Correlation Rules to automate account mapping during imports.

User matches with Identity

Security System matches with Application Category

Endpoint matches with Application

Workflow matches with Access Approval

User and Identity: In the context of Identity and Access Management (IAM), "User" often relates to "Identity" management, which deals with user accounts, profiles, and their associated attributes.

Security System and Application Category: "Security System" is a broad term. Within the image, it is a category under which applications are managed, making "Application Category" the correct match.

Endpoint and Application: "Endpoints" in Saviynt refer to the target systems or applications that are being managed or integrated. Therefore "Endpoint" relates to "Application."

Workflow and Access Approval: "Workflows" are often used to define and automate processes, and in this case, it relates to the "Access Approval" process.

The connection type best suited to expose Workday reports as a data service in Saviynt is A. Workday-RAAS (Report as a Service). Here's why:

Workday-RAAS: This connection type is specifically designed to integrate with Workday's RaaS functionality. Workday RaaS allows you to expose custom reports created within Workday as web services that can be consumed by external applications like Saviynt.

Data Service for Reports: RaaS essentially turns a Workday report into a data service, making it easy to retrieve the report's data in a structured format (typically XML or JSON).

Saviynt's Integration: Saviynt's Workday-RAAS connection type is built to leverage this capability, allowing you to:

Select Workday Reports: Choose the specific Workday reports you want to integrate with.

Import Data: Import the data from those reports into Saviynt for various purposes (e.g., identity governance, access certification, analytics).

Schedule Imports: Schedule regular data imports to keep Saviynt's data synchronized with Workday.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Workday-REST: While Workday has a REST API, it's more general-purpose and not specifically tailored for exposing reports as data services in the same way as RaaS.

C. Workday-OAuth: OAuth is an authorization protocol, not a connection type for retrieving report data.

D. Workday-SOAP: Workday's SOAP API is being gradually replaced by the REST API and is less focused on report data retrieval than RaaS.

=================

To make an application available for access requests (either self-service or requests for others), the Access Add Workflow needs to be configured within Saviynt. This workflow defines the process that governs how access to the application is granted. Here's a breakdown with Saviynt IGA references:

Saviynt's Access Request System (ARS): This is the module within Saviynt that handles access requests. The ARS relies on defined workflows to manage the approval and provisioning process.

Access Add Workflow: This specific type of workflow within Saviynt's ARS is triggered when a user requests access to an application or entitlement. It dictates the steps involved, such as:

Requester Details: Capturing information about who is requesting access.

Application/Entitlement Selection: The user selects the application (and potentially specific roles or entitlements within that application) for which they are requesting access.

Approval Routing: Defining the approval chain (e.g., manager approval, application owner approval, etc.). This is configured within the workflow using various approval activities.

Provisioning: Upon approval, the workflow can trigger automated provisioning of access to the target system (if connected integration is set up).

Saviynt's Application Onboarding: For an application to be available in the ARS, it needs to be onboarded into Saviynt. During this process, you would typically define the relevant entitlements (access rights) associated with the application.

Workflow Configuration in Saviynt: Saviynt's admin interface allows administrators to create and customize workflows using a visual designer. This includes setting up conditions, defining approval steps, and configuring actions to be taken at each stage of the workflow.

Other options:

Proposed Accounts Workflow: This is less common, often used to suggest potential accounts during the request or account creation process. It's not the primary mechanism for making an application available for access requests.

Access Remove Workflow: This workflow is used when access needs to be revoked, not granted.

Emergency Access ID Request Workflow: This workflow is specific to requesting temporary, elevated access in emergency situations. It's not the workflow for general access requests to applications.

=================

The correct sequence of workflow events for an application where the Manager's approval should be followed by the Application Owner's approval is D. Start > Manager's Approval > Resource Owner's Approval > Approve/Reject > End. Here's a breakdown:

Saviynt's Workflow Structure: Saviynt workflows follow a sequential structure, starting with a "Start" event and ending with an "End" event.

Workflow Activities: Each step in the workflow is represented by an activity, such as an approval task.

Manager's Approval: In this scenario, the first required approval is from the Manager. This would be represented by a "TASK Access Approve" activity (or similar, depending on the specific configuration) assigned to the user's manager.

Application Owner's Approval: After the Manager's approval, the workflow needs to proceed to the Application Owner for their approval. This would be another "TASK Access Approve" activity assigned to the Application Owner. In Saviynt terms, Application Owner is a type of Resource Owner.

Approve/Reject: This activity represents the decision point where the final approver (in this case, the Application Owner) either approves or rejects the request.

End: The workflow concludes with the "End" event, signifying the completion of the process.

Other Options:

A. Start > Resource Owner's Approval > Manager's Approval > Approve/Reject > End: Incorrect order; the manager's approval should come before the application owner's.

B. Start > Manager's Approval > Custom Assignment > Approve/Reject > End: "Custom Assignment" is not the most appropriate activity for a standard approval step. "TASK Access Approve" would be more suitable.

C. Start > Manager's Approval > Access Approval > Approve/Reject > End: "Access Approval" is a bit redundant; "TASK Access Approve" assigned to the appropriate role is clearer.

In essence: The correct workflow sequence accurately reflects the required approval hierarchy: first the Manager, then the Application Owner, followed by the final decision (Approve/Reject) and the end of the workflow.

To set up an Entitlement Owner Campaign for Entitlements belonging to an Oracle ERP Endpoint that launches at the beginning of every month, and includes only Accounts and Entitlements that meet the prerequisites, the 2-key configurations you should recommend are A. Use Campaign Template and the Schedule Later option. Here's a breakdown:

Campaign Template:

Purpose: Templates allow you to save a set of campaign configurations as a reusable template. This is ideal for recurring campaigns with consistent settings.

Benefits: Using a template saves time and ensures consistency across multiple campaign instances. You can define the scope (Oracle ERP Endpoint), Certifier type (Entitlement Owners), and other settings within the template.

Prerequisites: You can include logic within the template to filter for Accounts and Entitlements that meet the defined prerequisites.

Schedule Later option:

Purpose: This option allows you to schedule the campaign to launch at a specific date and time in the future.

Recurring Scheduling: You can configure the campaign to run on a recurring schedule, such as the beginning of every month.

Automation: This automates the campaign launch process, eliminating the need for manual intervention each month.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Use Advanced Configurations and Preview mode and create the Campaign at the beginning of each month: This approach is manual and prone to errors. It doesn't leverage the automation benefits of templates and scheduling.

C. Use Advanced Configurations and set the Campaign expiry to 31 days: While setting an expiry is important, it doesn't address the need for recurring monthly launches or using a template for consistent configuration.

D. Cannot be achieved: This is incorrect; the scenario can be easily achieved using Campaign Templates and the Schedule Later option.

=================