Pass the VMware VCP-VCF Administrator 2V0-17.25 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

TheVCF Automation Provider Networking Guidestates:

“Before you can configure Provider Networking, an active Tier-0 (T0) Gateway must be created in NSX Manager and associated with the Provider region.”

This gateway provides external routing and forms the foundation for VPC and tenant networking. Creating a T0 at the Organization level (A) is not correct—organizations consume Provider networking but do not create T0s. vDS in Provider Management (C) or vCenter (D) is unrelated to NSX-based provider networking.

Thus, the required prerequisite is:Create a T0 Gateway in NSX Manager.

TheVCF 9.0 Service Mesh Integration Guidedefines Istio as: “Istio Service Mesh provides an infrastructure layer that transparently handles service-to-service communication, securing, observing, and controlling traffic between microservices.” The key purpose is enabling structured and observable communication between applications. While Istio includes discovery and load balancing, those are features, not the overarching purpose. A centralized routing table (Option D) is not the core definition. VMware documentation highlights Istio’s role inservice-to-service communication, observability, and policy enforcementwithin the service mesh. Therefore, the correct answer isB.

The vSphere 9.0 Resource Management documentation, included within VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, specifies that Resource Pools are the mechanism to delegate compute resources within a cluster. A resource pool acts as a container of compute resources (CPU and memory) that can be subdivided and assigned to VMs or groups of VMs.

The documentation states:

“Resource pools provide resource isolation, control, and delegation. You can configure reservations, limits, and shares to ensure that mission-critical workloads (such as production VMs) receive guaranteed resources, while development or test workloads consume only available resources.”

This aligns directly with the requirements:

Power on only if resources are available → Achieved via reservations and limits.

Production VMs require guaranteed levels of resources → Enforced using reservations.

Three-tier apps with varying demand → Controlled using shares and limits across multiple resource pools.

Other options are incorrect:

vSphere Availability (A) provides failover, not resource governance.

VCF Operations (B) monitors resource usage but does not allocate or enforce it.

Dynamic Resource Scheduling (D) balances workloads but does not provide delegated, guaranteed allocations per department or application tier.

Thus, the correct feature is vSphere Resource Pools.

TheVCF 9.0 Automation Guidedetails the use ofProperty Groupsto standardize blueprint inputs and constants across projects. Property Groups allow administrators to define sets of inputs (like size, os, location) and constants (like salt master id) centrally, ensuring consistency across deployments.

The correct actions are:

Create a new Property Group for input properties (C)to capture the standard inputs (size, os, location).

Create a new Property Group for constant properties (E)to include items like the salt master id.

Update all existing blueprints in the production project with the new Property Groups (F)to enforce standardization across new and existing workloads.

Options A and B are incorrect because changes are not required in theappdevproject or across the entire organization—only theproductionproject. Option D is redundant since inputs and constants should be separated into distinct groups.

TheVCF 9.0 Architecture Guideoutlines validprincipal storage optionsfor the management domain. It states: “The management domain must be deployed using vSAN, NFS, or Fibre Channel (FC). Supported protocols include NFSv3 and VMFS on FC.” vSAN (including OSA) is the default recommended option, but NFSv3 and VMFS on FC are also supported for environments where external storage arrays are required.

NVMe/TCP and vVols arenot supportedfor the initial management domain’s principal storage. vVols may be used in workload domains after deployment, but they are not a supported foundation for the management domain. Therefore, the three correct storage solutions for the first management workload domain are:VMFS on FC, NFSv3, and vSAN OSA.

TheVCF 9.0 Operations Guide – Views and Reportsexplains the four types of views available for custom dashboards:

Object Relationship View:Displays dependencies and hierarchy between objects (for example, VMs, hosts, datastores) but does not provide exportable tabular data.

Scoreboard View:Provides a high-level KPI visualization of a few key objects but is not intended for large tabular exports.

List View (Correct):Displays tabular data across many objects, such as CPU, memory, and disk metrics for VMs. The guide states:“List views are useful when you want to compare metrics across multiple objects and can be exported to CSV for further analysis.”

Trend View:Focuses on historical data and growth over time, but export to CSV is not its primary purpose.

Because the security team requires bothtabular comparison of VM resource usageand the ability toexport the data to CSV, theList Viewis the only option that meets both requirements.

TheVCF Healthfeature “provides a central location for monitoring the health of your environment,” including the ability to track “vCenter Server instances,” “ESXi hosts,” and “NSX deployments.” Health monitoring includes connectivity, configuration, and critical services status, surfacing alerts for remediation. The documentation’s scope statements make clear that VCF Health targets theinfrastructure components—vCenter, ESXi, and NSX—rather than the VCF Operations applications themselves (for example, Fleet Management or Logs). Therefore, the correct monitored components areESX hosts,vCenter Server, andNSX.

TheVCF 9.0 Operations Access Control Guidedescribes how dashboard sharing and user access is managed:

Identity Broker Authentication (D):All external users must authenticate via theVCF Identity Broker, which integrates with Active Directory, LDAP, or other identity providers. Documentation states:“Identity Broker provides single sign-on and federation, ensuring users are authenticated consistently across VCF Operations and Automation services.”

Grant Access to Dashboard (E):After authentication, the administrator must explicitlygrant accessto the dashboard for the specified group. This ensures that only the intended users can view or interact with the dashboard.

Set Time-Bound Access (C):VCF Operations supports time-bound access policies. The documentation specifies:“Access can be granted with an expiration period, ensuring access is automatically revoked after the configured interval (for example, 90 days).”This aligns with the 3-month requirement.

Other options are not suitable:

Reports (A)only send static data, not interactive dashboard access.

Embedded code (B, F)bypasses access control and does not provide authentication or time-limited sharing, which violates the security requirement.

Thus, the correct three steps are:Use Identity Broker (D), Grant access to dashboard (E), and Configure 3-month access expiration (C).

AVM Classpredefines hardware for Supervisor-managed VMs: “The VM class… defines such parameters as the number of virtual CPUs, memory capacity, and reservation settings.”

Administration steps show these are configurable: “You can configure hardware resources such as CPU, memory, and different devices” when editing a VM class.

Additionally, the DCLI/API specification underscores CPU and Memory fields: “--cpu-count … Required.” and “--memory-mb … Required.” for a VM class.

While network adapters, PCI devices, and instance storage can also be added via advanced config, the question asks for two;CPUandMemoryare canonical, always-present VM Class resources per the core definition above.

===========

The VCF 9.0 Operations Policies Guide explains how to extend and scope monitoring policies:

Create a child policy under the existing Organization Policy (C): Policies can inherit settings from parent policies. By creating a child policy underOrganization Policy, administrators can apply additional metrics without overriding global policies.

Create a Custom Group (F): Custom Groups allow dynamic membership based on naming conventions or criteria. In this case, business-critical VMs can be grouped automatically by naming schema.

Assign the Custom Group to the new child policy (B): This ensures that the additional metrics only apply to the business-critical VMs in the Custom Group.

Incorrect options:

Custom Datacenters (A, D) are not required; the grouping requirement can be met with Custom Groups.

Creating the policy underBase Settings(E) would apply globally rather than inheriting from the Organization Policy.