Pass the DSCI Certification DCPLA Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

A privacy incident management plan generally includes detection, containment, remediation, and communication of incidents. It also includes root cause analysis and steps to prevent recurrence. However, deferring data access rules for business users is unrelated to incident management. Instead, it falls under access governance or information usage policies.

Hence, option B is outside the scope of incident management as per the DSCI Privacy Framework.

==============

Under the “Visibility over Personal Information (VPI)” practice area of the DSCI Privacy Framework, the first and foundational step in any privacy implementation is to:

“Create an inventory of business processes and associated data elements involving personal information.”

This baseline mapping ensures that organizations understand what data is processed, where it resides, and how it flows across systems and third parties. This forms the basis for subsequent governance, risk assessment, and compliance alignment.

==============

The consulting arm of XYZ developed a comprehensive privacy program in line with the company’s goal to leverage its existing technology infrastructure, resources and capabilities for protecting data. The program had three parts – awareness and training, policy development and implementation. On the awareness front, extensive training was conducted for employees on various aspects of privacy including GDPR compliance. This was followed by the development and rollout of an enterprise-wide privacy policy which clearly defined the various steps to be taken to protect sensitive personal information (SPI) such as encryption, access controls etc. After this, customer contracts were reviewed for appropriate protection clauses and service providers were made to sign ‘reasonable security practices’ clauses in their contractual obligations as specified in EU GDPR.

At first glance, it seemed that XYZ had taken adequate steps to protect SPI dealt by its service providers and ensure that it complies with the regulatory requirements. However, on careful scrutiny, there were some lacunae in the program. For instance, as per EU GDPR, personal data must be pseudonymized or encrypted prior to transfer from one entity to another. In this case, though encryption was mentioned in the policy documents but there were no specific measures given for ensuring proper encryption of data before any transfer. Similarly, ‘reasonable security practices’ clause was included in customer contracts but there was no mention of any tools like firewalls or other means of protecting sensitive information which could have further strengthened the privacy protection efforts made by the company.

Thus, it is clear that XYZ did made some efforts to comply with the EU GDPR but in order to ensure full compliance, more specific measures should have been taken and all contractual obligations must be such that they clearly define the security and privacy controls that need to be put in place between customer/client and service provider. This would further give customers greater assurance of privacy protection from XYZ’s services. Going forward, XYZ can consider investing in more advanced technologies like biometrics authentication etc for maximum security of data. Furthermore, the company should also ensure periodic reviews of its policy documents and contracts so as to ensure better protection of sensitive personal information.

Overall, though XYZ took some reasonable steps to protect SPI of its customers, it should have done more by introducing advanced security measures and including stringent contractual obligations for service providers. This would have enabled the company to achieve full compliance with EU GDPR and ensure greater security of customer’s personal data.

The concept of "Privacy by Design" is a core principle emphasized in the DSCI Privacy Framework (DPF©) and DSCI Assessment Framework for Privacy (DAF-P©). This principle requires that privacy be integrated into the design specifications and architecture of IT systems and business processes, right from the start of the development process rather than being added later as an afterthought.

The DSCI Privacy Framework states:

"Privacy by Design is a proactive approach that embeds privacy into the design and operation of IT systems, networked infrastructure, and business practices. It aims to ensure that privacy is built into the system by default, thereby preventing privacy-invasive events before they happen."

This ensures data protection is foundational to system architecture and not merely a compliance requirement added later. This proactive method mitigates risks and enhances user trust by safeguarding personal information through preventive measures rather than reactive ones.

According to the DSCI Privacy Framework and aligned international frameworks such as GDPR and APEC, a “Data Subject” refers to:

"An identified or identifiable natural person to whom the personal data relates."

This includes individuals whose data is being collected, held, or processed by any entity. Thus:

A (an individual providing their data to avail a service) is a data subject because the data is about them.

C (an individual whose data/information is processed) directly matches the definition.

Options B, D, and E refer to entities or persons involved in processing or handling the data, not the individuals to whom the data belongs.

==============

As per the official DSCI Privacy Framework (DPF©), the framework is built upon a set of nine core Privacy Principles that are foundational to establishing and assessing privacy initiatives in an organization. These principles are as follows:

Notice– Individuals must be informed about the collection and use of their personal data.

ChoiceandConsent– The data subject’s choice must be respected through consent mechanisms.

Collection Limitation– Personal data must be collected only for identified purposes.

Use Limitation– Data should be used only for the purposes specified at the time of collection.

Data Quality– Ensuring data is accurate, complete, and kept up-to-date.

AccessandCorrection– Data subjects must have access to their data and the ability to correct it.

Security– Adequate protection of personal data against unauthorized access and breaches.

Openness– Organizations must be transparent about their privacy practices.

Accountability– The entity collecting and processing data is responsible for complying with the principles.

These match exactly with the components listed in option A: I (Use Limitation), II (Accountability), III (Data Quality), IV (Notice), V (Preventing Harm—not explicitly named in DPF, hence not part of the standard nine), VI (ChoiceandConsent), VII (Access and Correction), VIII (Data Minimization), IX (Openness).

Hence, the correct nine principles according to DPF© are exactly as listed in option A.

==============

Yes, I agree with the company’s decision to have a single privacy policy for all its relationships and functions. Having a unified privacy policy allows the organization to communicate consistently across multiple channels of communication with customers, partners and vendors. It also ensures that all stakeholders are aware of their rights when dealing with personal data and makes it easier for them to understand their responsibilities when handling such information.

Moreover, having a standardized privacy policy helps to protect the company from potential legal repercussions due to inadequate protection of confidential data. The need for comprehensive protection is especially important in this age where cyber-attacks are becoming increasingly frequent and sophisticated. By putting in place a consistent framework that governs how any organization handles sensitive information can help reduce the risks associated with data breaches.

By demonstrating that the company takes strong measures to protect its customers' personal information, a single privacy policy can help boost the company's reputation and build trust with customers. Compliance with a variety of regulatory requirements is especially important for companies operating in regulated industries, such as banking and healthcare.

In addition, having a unified privacy policy allows organizations to maintain control over how their data is stored and processed. By monitoring who has access to confidential information, companies can identify any potential security vulnerabilities before they are exploited by malicious actors.

To conclude, I support XYZ's decision to have one privacy policy for all its relationships and functions. Having a unified privacy policy can help the organization protect itself from potential legal risks, boost its reputation and maintain control over how data is stored and used. All in all, it is an important step to ensure that customer data is always kept safe and secure.

The DSCI Assessment Framework for Privacy (DAF‑P©) outlines that the Privacy Third Party Assessment is conducted in two phases:

Initial Assessment – High-level review of privacy practices and process readiness

Detailed Assessment – In-depth evaluation of privacy implementation and evidence review

This phased approach allows assessors to identify maturity gaps early and gather comprehensive evidence in the second phase.

==============

Data adequacy is a concept primarily referenced under international data transfer mechanisms, especially in GDPR and mirrored in Indian and global privacy frameworks. The idea is that a country can receive personal data from another country if it ensures an "adequate level of protection".

This level is determined not by exact replication of laws but by their “Essential Equivalence” to the originating country's standards.

The principle of “Essential Equivalence” means that although the laws do not have to be identical, they must offer comparable protection in practice. This is the benchmark used by authorities like the EU Commission and reflected in frameworks including DPF©.

==============

The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 introduced critical provisions for data protection:

Section 43A: Mandates compensation for failure to protect personal data by a body corporate handling sensitive personal data or information (SPDI).

Section 72A: Imposes penalties for disclosure of information in breach of lawful contracts.

These two sections form the legal basis for protection of personal data under the IT Act in India.

==============