Pass the PECB ISO 45001 ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Clause 10.2 requires organizations to investigate nonconformities, determine their causes, and take corrective actions to prevent recurrence. Clause 9.2.2 specifies the requirements for managing internal audit processes, while Clause 7.4.3 emphasizes the need to communicate relevant information effectively.

Analysis of Options:

A. 9.2.2.e - Management failed to take any action to deal with the audit nonconformity:Correct. Management must ensure that internal audit findings are addressed promptly. The lack of action violates Clause 9.2.2.e.

B. 9.2.2.d - Staff were not made aware that health and safety incidents were increasing:Incorrect. This clause pertains to the planning and conduct of audits, not the communication of findings.

C. 8.1.1 - Operations were not properly controlled to avoid health and safety incidents:Incorrect. While increased incidents may suggest operational issues, this option does not directly relate to the internal audit findings.

D. 9.2.2 - Report IA202 contained a poorly worded nonconformity (NC3):Incorrect. The clarity of the nonconformity wording is not directly relevant to Clause 9.2.2.

E. 10.2.b - The root cause of the increase in reported health and safety accidents was not investigated:Correct. Failure to investigate root causes violates Clause 10.2.b.

F. 7.4.3 - The results of the internal audit IA202 were not communicated to interested parties:Correct. Effective communication of audit results is required under Clause 7.4.3.

ISO References:

Clause 9.2.2: Internal audit process requirements.

Clause 10.2: Nonconformity and corrective action.

Clause 7.4.3: Communication requirements.

A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated

Explanation

Prepares the audit report → Audit Team Leader:The Audit Team Leader is responsible for compiling and preparing the final audit report, summarizing findings and conclusions.

Prepares audit checklists for use during the audit → Auditor:Auditors create checklists to ensure a thorough and systematic evaluation during the audit.

Participates under the direction and guidance of an auditor → Auditor in Training:An auditor in training works under supervision to gain experience and contribute to the audit process.

Follows up on audit findings within an agreed timeframe → Auditee:The auditee is responsible for addressing and resolving audit findings and providing evidence of corrective actions.

A person who accompanies the audit team but does not act as an auditor → Observer:Observers are typically external parties or internal personnel who watch the audit process but do not participate actively.

Escorts the auditors but does not participate in the audit → Guide:A guide facilitates the audit by helping auditors navigate the site and access relevant areas or documents.

References

ISO 19011:2018: Guidelines for auditing management systems.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Clause 5.4 of ISO 45001:2018 emphasizes the importance of worker consultation and participation in the OHS management system. It requires organizations to establish processes that ensure workers are actively involved in decision-making and implementation of OHS practices.

Analysis of Options:

A. Promoting collaborating workers to higher positions:While promotions may boost morale, they do not directly contribute to worker consultation and participation in the OHSMS.

B. Appointing worker representatives:This action fosters direct communication and representation of workers' interests in health and safety matters.

C. Conducting toolbox talks on health and safety:Toolbox talks are an effective way to engage workers in discussing and addressing health and safety issues.

D. Giving ownership of health and safety matters:Involving workers in decision-making and giving them responsibility for specific health and safety tasks encourages participation.

E. Ignoring workers' suggestions:This undermines consultation and is contrary to ISO 45001 principles.

F. Implementing a payment scheme to reward workers' OHS performance:While incentives can motivate safe behavior, they are not a consultation or participation mechanism as required by Clause 5.4.

G. Implementing methods for engaging workers:This aligns directly with Clause 5.4, as effective engagement methods (e.g., surveys, focus groups) enhance participation.

H. Threatening reprisals to whistleblowers:This violates ISO 45001 principles and discourages worker participation.

ISO References:

Clause 5.4: Worker consultation and participation.

Clause 5.1: Leadership’s responsibility to foster participation.

The PDCA cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act) is a core framework in ISO 45001 for continual improvement of the OH&S management system. An Environmental Management Program is part of ISO 14001 (Environmental Management System) and not ISO 45001.

Analysis of Options:

A. Treatment of Risks:Correct. Risk treatment is part of the Plan phase.

B. OHSMS Policy:Correct. The policy is developed in the Plan phase.

C. Environment Management Program:Incorrect. This is outside the scope of ISO 45001 and relates to ISO 14001.

D. Analyzing OHSMS Performance:Correct. Performance analysis is part of the Check phase.

ISO References:

Clause 0.3: PDCA framework in ISO 45001.

Major nonconformities are raised when there is a systemic failure to meet ISO 45001 requirements that could lead to significant risks.

Analysis of Options:

B. Lack of a documented process for controlling outsourced work (8.1.4.3):Major nonconformity. A failure to control outsourced work is a serious systemic issue.

C. Failure to include OH&S policy in contractor contracts (5.2.f):Not a major nonconformity. While this is a nonconformity, it is procedural and not critical.

D. No hazard assessment for installation works (6.1.2.2):Major nonconformity. A lack of hazard assessment for site-specific tasks is a serious issue.

E. Missing safety data sheets for contractor chemicals (8.1.4.2):Not a major nonconformity. While important, this issue does not indicate systemic failure.

G. Chemical hazards on installation sites not referenced in the hazard list (6.1.2.2):Major nonconformity. This reflects a failure in hazard identification and risk assessment.

H. Internal audit program does not cover installation sites (9.2.2):Not a major nonconformity. This is a gap in auditing scope but does not directly endanger safety.

I. Safe use of chemicals left to contractors:Not a major nonconformity. This could be addressed through improved contractor oversight rather than indicating systemic failure.

ISO References:

Clause 8.1.4.3: Control of outsourced processes.

Clause 6.1.2.2: Hazard identification and risk assessment.

Clause 7.4.1: Communication requirements.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Clause 8.1.2 of ISO 45001 pertains to Eliminating Hazards and Reducing OH&S Risks. Organizations must implement appropriate controls to manage workplace hazards effectively.

Issue Identified:The kitchen environment at the audited site presents multiple hazards, including:

Oil spillage creating a slip hazard.

Open drums of waste material posing a chemical or hygiene hazard.

Unsecured knives and cleavers increasing the risk of cuts.

Boiling water left unattended, posing a risk of burns.

Lack of visible fire extinguishers or fire blankets, increasing fire risk.

Analysis of Options:

A. Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen.This option accurately captures the broader failure to implement effective measures to eliminate or reduce hazards across multiple areas in the kitchen.

B. Measures to prevent slippage in the kitchen from waste cooking oil were not taken.This is specific to one hazard (oil spillage) and does not address other significant risks observed, such as fire safety or sharp tools.

C. Staff are at risk of serious injury while working in the kitchen.While true, this is more of a general observation and does not address the root cause of the hazards or the failure of controls.

D. Training of the kitchen staff was not effective enough to prevent poor safety awareness in the kitchen area.Although training deficiencies may contribute to the issue, this option does not reflect the overarching systemic failure to manage hazards effectively.

Best Description of the Nonconformance:Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen (Option A) is the most comprehensive finding, reflecting the organization’s lack of adequate controls to mitigate hazards.

ISO References:

Clause 8.1.2: Organizations must establish controls to eliminate or minimize OH&S risks systematically.

Clause 7.2: Ensuring competency through training is important but must be coupled with hazard control measures.

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Opportunities for improvement (OFIs) are suggestions provided during audits that do not indicate nonconformities but are aimed at enhancing the system’s performance.

Analysis of Options:

A. A quality control program could involve non-destructive testing of the welded handrails:While beneficial, this focuses on product quality rather than OH&S improvements.

B. Operational planning activities may benefit from an improved risk-based approach based on international standards for risk management:Correct. Enhancing risk-based thinking aligns with Clause 6.1.1.

C. A first aid station could be located next to the handrail polishing operation:While useful, first aid station placement is an operational matter, not directly related to OH&S management system improvement.

D. Additional internal audits of the OHS management system may reduce production problems:Internal audits should address system performance, not production problems.

F. The induction program for new employees could include an awareness training video on health and safety:Correct. Enhanced training for new employees addresses Clause 7.2 (competence).

G. The requirement for wearing protective gloves could be extended to shop floor workers across all operations:Correct. This improves hazard control in line with Clause 8.1.2.

H. The molding polishers should be disciplined for incompetency:Disciplinary actions are outside the scope of system improvement.

ISO References:

Clause 6.1.1: Risk management.

Clause 7.2: Competence.

Clause 8.1.2: Hierarchy of controls.