Pass the PeopleCert DevOps DevOps-SRE Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Service Level Indicators (SLIs) provide the quantitative measurements needed to determine how much of the Service Level Objective (SLO) has been consumed. Since the error budget is defined as the allowable amount of unreliability, SLI data is the source of truth for calculating how much of that budget remains.

From the Site Reliability Engineering Book, Chapter “Service Level Objectives”:

“SLIs provide the measurements used to determine compliance with SLOs. Error budgets are computed directly from the SLI measurements over the defined time window.”

The SRE Workbook further explains:

“Error budgets quantify the inverse of SLO performance. SLIs provide the raw data that allow teams to calculate how much of the budget has been consumed and how much remains.”

Thus, SLI data is the Only mechanism that determines remaining error budget.

Therefore, the statement is True.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In a safety culture, SRE emphasizes psychological safety so engineers can work effectively in production without fear of blame. However, safety never removes accountability. Engineers must take responsibility for their actions, decisions, and assumptions, particularly during incidents.

The Site Reliability Engineering Book, Chapter “Postmortem Culture,” states:

“Blamelessness does not eliminate accountability. Individuals must still explain the context, assumptions, and reasoning behind their decisions so that the organization can learn.”

Google stresses that:

Engineers must feel safe to act and report issues

Engineers must remain responsible and accountable

Accountability enables learning, not punishment

Why other options are incorrect:

A Sharing incidents on social media violates confidentiality

C Blameless postmortems are required, not skipped

D Avoiding on-call is contrary to SRE responsibilities

Thus, B is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Achieving high availability in SRE practice is driven by accurate measurement of what matters and fast detection and correction of issues. According to Google’s Site Reliability Engineering Book, measurement of critical user-facing signals is foundational: “SLIs must capture the aspects of the service that are most critical to users and must be measured with high accuracy.” (SRE Book – Chapter: Service Level Objectives). Without measuring the critical aspects of a service—latency, errors, availability, and quality—teams cannot make informed decisions or detect degradation effectively.

The SRE book also emphasizes reducing MTTR (Mean Time to Repair) and tightening the feedback loop between detection and correction. Google states: “Reducing the time between detection and mitigation is one of the most effective levers for improving availability.” (SRE Book – Chapters on Incident Response & Monitoring). Rapid identification and resolution directly improve a system’s availability and resilience.

Option D (1 and 4) is the only choice that correctly reflects SRE principles.

Measuring critical aspects → essential for correct SLO/SLI alignment

Maintaining a short interval between detection and correction → drives higher availability

Options including staff performance measurement or generic development relationships are not mentioned as availability-driving factors in the SRE literature.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Containers provide a major advantage that aligns with SRE: portability and environment consistency. The SRE Workbook describes containers as: “lightweight, portable units that encapsulate applications and dependencies, ensuring consistent behavior across environments.” This independence from the host OS environment enables predictable deployments and simplifies automation, scaling, and orchestration—especially when used with Kubernetes.

Option A captures this exact benefit: portability and independence from the host OS.

Option B is incorrect—containers do not reduce the number of developers required.

Option C incorrectly claims that efficiency comes from virtual machines; containers are typically more efficient because they avoid VM overhead, not leverage it.

Option D is incorrect—containers do not “inherit” security automatically; in fact, they require additional security controls.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

An error budget accounts for all downtime, including both planned and unplanned outages. This is a critical SRE principle: the user does not distinguish between maintenance downtime and accidental downtime — therefore, neither should the SLO nor the error budget.

The SRE Book, Chapter “Service Level Objectives,” states:

“From the user’s perspective, availability is simply whether the service is working or not, regardless of whether the outage was planned or unplanned.”

This means all downtime counts toward the error budget.

Additionally, the SRE Workbook reinforces this point:

“Error budgets must include every form of unavailability — maintenance events, configuration changes, emergency work, and unexpected incidents.”

This confirms that planned outages (maintenance windows) and unplanned outages (incidents) both consume error budget.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A Only includes unplanned incidents; SRE requires counting planned outages as well.

B Defect fixes may contribute to downtime, but “defect fixes” alone are not a downtime category.

D CAB approval has no bearing on whether outages count toward error budgets.

Thus, C is correct: any planned or unplanned outage must be included.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

SRE supports microservices architecture because it improves reliability by reducing blast radius, allowing independent deployments, and enabling scalable autonomous teams. The SRE Book notes: “Microservices enable teams to independently iterate and improve reliability without the constraints of large monolithic systems.” (SRE Book – Distributed Systems). One of the strongest reasons to adopt microservices is modernizing and refactoring large legacy monoliths, allowing them to be broken into independently deployable, maintainable components.

Option A is therefore the best justification.

Options B, C, and D may involve architectural choices, but they do not explain why microservices are the preferred architecture for reliability and scalability.

Thus, A is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Google’s SRE definition is explicit: “Site Reliability Engineering is what happens when you ask a software engineer to design an operations team.” (SRE Book – Introduction). This clearly defines SRE as a software engineering approach applied to operational problems. The goal is to use software techniques—automation, coding, testing, version control, CI/CD, observability—to improve reliability and reduce toil. The book emphasizes: “SRE applies software engineering to operations work.” (SRE Book – What Is SRE?).

Option C is the only answer fully aligned with the official definition.

Options A, B, and D do not correspond to the SRE definition provided by Google.

Thus, the correct missing phrase is software engineering.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In the context of SRE tooling and automation, configuration management platforms like Puppet support large-scale infrastructure reliability by enabling consistency, repeatability, and automation. Puppet’s Discovery capability allows engineers to automatically locate, identify, classify, and group cloud nodes or infrastructure resources. Although not directly from Google’s SRE Book, Discovery aligns with SRE principles of reducing toil and enabling scalable automation. SRE emphasizes “automating away the manual work of locating and managing infrastructure at scale.” (SRE Book – Chapter: Eliminating Toil). Puppet Discovery does precisely this by automatically scanning environments, detecting nodes, and providing metadata to group or manage them.

Option A (Provisioning) refers to creating infrastructure, not identifying it.

Option B (Delivery) relates to CI/CD processes.

Option D (Insight) relates to analytics and reporting, not node identification.

Therefore, C. Discovery is correct as it directly represents the capability described.