Pass the Scrum SAFe Certification SAFe-Practitioner Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

The ART planning board, also known as the program board, is a visualization of the PI’s feature delivery dates, feature dependencies among teams, and relevant milestones. It helps the ART align on a common mission and vision, identify and resolve dependencies, and track progress and risks throughout the PI. The ART planning board does not show risks, capacity and load, or epics, although these may be discussed or tracked elsewhere during PI planning or execution. References: ART Planning Board, PI Planning, SAFe Program Board 101

 The balance between emergent design and intentional architecture when building in quality is required for speed of development and maintainability. Emergent design is the practice of defining and evolving the architecture only as necessary to deliver the next increment of functionality, based on the feedback and learning from the previous increments. Intentional architecture is the practice of defining and implementing some upfront design guidelines and standards that enable the integration and evolution of the solution across multiple teams and domains. Both practices are implemented with enablers, which are technical items that support the development and delivery of features and capabilities. The balance between emergent design and intentional architecture allows the teams and the Agile Release Train (ART) to deliver value faster, with higher quality and lower risk, and to maintain and improve the solution over time12. The other options are not accurate descriptions of the balance between emergent design and intentional architecture, as they either do not reflect the benefits of both practices, or use terms that are not relevant to the SAFe context. References: Architectural Runway - Scaled Agile Framework, Built-In Quality - Scaled Agile Framework

= As a Product Owner, James is responsible for managing the Iteration backlog and ensuring that the most valuable and feasible work items are delivered by the team1. If the team tells him that they may miss their Iteration commitment, James should collaborate with them to review and reprioritize the backlog, and identify the minimum viable increment that can be completed within the Iteration timebox2. James should not support adding an Innovation and Planning Iteration, as this would disrupt the cadence and synchronization of the Agile Release Train3. James should not agree to add a person from the System Team, as this would violate the team autonomy and self-organization principles4. James should not support splitting a Story into a coding story and a testing story, as this would create technical debt and compromise the quality and value of the deliverable5. References: = 1: Product Owner - Scaled Agile Framework6; 2: Iteration Planning - Scaled Agile Framework7; 3: Innovation and Planning Iteration - Scaled Agile Framework8; 4: Agile Teams - Scaled Agile Framework9; 5: Story - Scaled Agile Framework10

 Business Owners assign business value to team PI Objectives to provide a common language for communicating with business and technology stakeholders, create the near-term focus and vision, enable the ART to assess its performance and the business value achieved, communicate and highlight each team’s contribution to business value, expose dependencies that require coordination, and provide an input to execution considerations. By assigning business value, Business Owners empower teams to make decisions around work that aligns with the business goals and priorities. References: PI Objectives, Business Owners, Your Guide to Writing Great Iteration and PI Objectives, PI Objectives - Easy Agile, Why do business owners assign business value to PI objectives?

Learn more

1blob:https://www.bing.com/08a92a67-4d7c-410c-82a9-cafd0c3ce0c2

scaledagileframework.com2blob:https://www.bing.com/08a92a67-4d7c-410c-82a9-cafd0c3ce0c2

scaledagileframework.com3blob:https://www.bing.com/569f3bf9-d7d0-4a63-9a40-bb3f52b4d112

scaledagile.com4blob:https://www.bing.com/e7b94a1d-0074-4150-a887-6152c0190872

help.easyagile.com5findanyanswer.com

A modified Fibonacci sequence is a relative estimating number sequence that reflects the inherent uncertainty of the job being estimated. It is based on the original Fibonacci sequence, which is a mathematical series of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones, starting from 0 and 1. The modified Fibonacci sequence, however, rounds up the larger numbers to avoid questions about why something is 21 instead of 20 or 34 instead of 40. The modified Fibonacci sequence is commonly used in Agile estimation techniques, such as Planning Poker, to assign story points to user stories or other backlog items. The sequence is: 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 100. References: Modified Fibonacci Sequence - Scaled Agile Framework, Fibonacci Agile Estimation: What Is It and Why Does it Work? - Parabol

 The definition of done (DoD) is a set of criteria that a product increment must meet for the team to consider it complete and ready for customers. It is a shared understanding among the team members of when a product increment is ready for release, even when the increment is large and consists of many items. The DoD is a commitment that the scrum team makes regarding the quality of the increment. The team promises that each increment will meet the DoD. They have checked all the quality checkboxes. This allows stakeholders to be confident that each new increment is usable and valuable. The DoD is not created by one person, but by the entire project team, including developers, testers, product owners, and other stakeholders. This ensures a smoother process during sprints since everyone is using the DoD as a guide alongside any checklists before marking an item as complete. Therefore, the agile teams are the primary stakeholders who develop the DoD for the team increment. References: What is the Definition of Done? Understanding DOD in Agile - Atlassian, What is the Definition of Done? | Scrum.org, How To Create A Definition Of Done | Agile Learning Labs, What is a Definition of Done? | Scrum.org

 The Product/Solution Vision presentation is the PI Planning activity where Product Management introduces the prioritized Features to the teams for planning. This presentation provides the teams with a clear and compelling vision of the expected outcomes and benefits of the upcoming PI. It also includes the top Features and Capabilities that are needed to realize the vision, along with their priorities and dependencies. The teams use this information to plan their Iteration goals and PI objectives, as well as to identify risks and issues that may affect their delivery. References: = PI Planning - Scaled Agile Framework, Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe® Practitioner

Learn more

1blob:https://www.bing.com/de17474a-36f7-4492-bee8-fda596ce6ca4

scaledagileframework.com2blob:https://www.bing.com/7ae70a2b-bc92-4a78-8062-40fdaf79bd54

support.scaledagile.com3blob:https://www.bing.com/7ae70a2b-bc92-4a78-8062-40fdaf79bd54

support.scaledagile.com4blob:https://www.bing.com/7885211d-18bd-4607-a6ae-2c64adb8f1b1

iconagility.com5blob:https://www.bing.com/f9138387-3093-43f1-9be4-d1ae13e5980f

scaledagile

According to the SAFe Implementation Roadmap1, the step that follows Coach ART Execution is Launch more ARTs and Value Streams. This step involves identifying and launching additional ARTs and Value Streams that are needed to deliver the full solution value. It also involves synchronizing the dependencies and alignment across the ARTs and Value Streams, and establishing Solution Trains to coordinate them. This step is essential to scale up the benefits of SAFe and achieve business agility. References: SAFe Implementation Roadmap, Launch More ARTs and Value Streams, Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe Practitioner

 An Agile Team collects the Iteration Metrics they have agreed upon during the quantitative part of the team retrospective. This is the part where the team assesses whether they met the Iteration Goals using a binary (yes or no) measure, and reviews the metrics that provide visibility and insight into the team’s performance and process improvement. Examples of Iteration Metrics include flow metrics, such as flow velocity, load and distribution, defects addressed, and automated test coverage. The team uses these metrics to identify trends, patterns, and areas for improvement, and to inform their qualitative feedback and improvement stories. References: Iteration Retrospective - Scaled Agile Framework, Metrics - Scaled Agile Framework