Pass the WGU Courses and Certificates Organizational-Behaviors-and-Leadership Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Perception in an organizational context is influenced by three primary factors: the situation, the target, and the perceiver. The situation refers to the context in which the perception occurs, the target is the object or person being perceived, and the perceiver is the individual forming the perception. In the scenario where Employee B is upset by Employee A's behavior, Employee B's perception is shaped by the specific circumstances of the planning meeting (situation), Employee A's actions (target), and Employee B's own experiences, attitudes, and psychological state (perceiver). This tripartite model explains how subjective perceptions can vary greatly among individuals. References: Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2019). "Organizational Behavior." Pearson Education; Schermerhorn, J.R., et al. (2018). "Organizational Behavior." Wiley.

A charismatic leader can increase performance in an organization by articulating an appealing vision. Charismatic leaders inspire and motivate their followers by presenting a compelling future state that aligns with their values and aspirations. This vision provides a sense of purpose and direction, encouraging employees to put in extra effort and align their behaviors with organizational goals. The transformational leadership literature extensively supports this approach, highlighting the role of vision articulation in enhancing organizational performance (Bass & Riggio, 2006).

According to the goal-setting theory of motivation, two critical factors contributing to goal achievement are goal specificity and feedback. Specific goals are clear and measurable, which helps individuals understand what is expected of them. Self-generated feedback allows individuals to monitor their own progress, make necessary adjustments, and stay motivated. In this scenario, the individual set a specific goal of selling an average of 10 items per call and making 25 sales calls, and kept a tally of calls and sales, providing self-generated feedback. Reference: Locke, E.A. & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation. American Psychologist.

The primary purpose of employee performance evaluations is to provide feedback and determine reward allocations. Performance evaluations offer a structured opportunity for managers to assess an employee's work performance, provide constructive feedback, and recognize achievements. This process helps in identifying areas for improvement, setting goals, and aligning individual performance with organizational objectives. Furthermore, performance evaluations are essential for making informed decisions about promotions, bonuses, and other rewards, thereby reinforcing desired behaviors and motivating employees. This is supported by organizational behavior literature, which emphasizes the role of performance appraisals in human resource management (Dessler, 2020).

Effective teams typically share certain characteristics that enhance their performance and cohesion. These characteristics include:

A climate of trust: Trust among team members is crucial for open communication, collaboration, and mutual support.

Specific team goals: Clear and well-defined goals provide direction and focus, ensuring that all team members are working towards the same objectives.

Members who are conscientious: Conscientious team members tend to be reliable, organized, and diligent, contributing positively to the team's performance.

These elements create a supportive environment where team members can thrive and work effectively towards common goals.

An organization can transmit its culture to employees through various means, including circulating stories. Stories about significant events, achievements, and key figures in the organization’s history help convey the organization’s values, norms, and traditions. These stories serve as a powerful tool for communicating cultural messages and reinforcing desired behaviors. Reference: Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2019). Organizational Behavior, 18th Edition. Pearson.

Organizational culture is considered dysfunctional when cultural incompatibility deters making acquisitions or mergers. Strong but misaligned cultures can create significant barriers to integration during mergers and acquisitions, leading to conflicts, reduced cooperation, and failure to achieve desired synergies. This dysfunction arises when the cultural values and practices of the merging organizations are fundamentally different, impeding successful collaboration (Cameron & Quinn, 2011).

A work group is characterized by the sum of individual efforts without the need for collective synergy. Each member is responsible for their own tasks and performance. In contrast, a work team involves coordinated effort where members work interdependently towards a common goal, leveraging collective skills and collaboration to achieve higher performance. Reference: Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2019). Organizational Behavior, 18th Edition. Pearson.