Pass the Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Professional DOP-C02 Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

The problem is that the DevOps engineer cannot assume the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role in the new member account that joined AnyCompany’s management account through an Organizations invitation. The solution is to create a new IAM role with the same name and trust policy in the new member account.

Option A is incorrect, as it does not address the root cause of the error. The DevOps engineer’s IAM user already has permission to assume the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role in any member account, as this is the default role name that AWS Organizations creates when a new account joins an organization. The error occurs because the new member account does not have this role, as it was not created by AWS Organizations.

Option B is incorrect, as it does not address the root cause of the error. An SCP is a policy that defines the maximum permissions for account members of an organization or organizational unit (OU). An SCP does not grant permissions to IAM users or roles, but rather limits the permissions that identity-based policies or resource-based policies grant to them. An SCP also does not affect how IAM roles are assumed by other principals.

Option C is correct, as it addresses the root cause of the error. By creating a new IAM role with the same name and trust policy as the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role in the new member account, the DevOps engineer can assume this role and access the account. The new role should have the AdministratorAccess AWS managed policy attached, which grants full access to all AWS resources in the account. The trust policy should allow the management account to assume the role, which can be done by specifying the management account ID as a principal in the policy statement.

Option D is incorrect, as it assumes that the new member account already has the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role, which is not true. The new member account does not have this role, as it was not created by AWS Organizations. Editing the trust policy of a non-existent role will not solve the problem.

Option A is the most cost-effective solution. By configuring a warm pool of EC2 instances in the Stopped state, the company can reduce the time it takes for new instances to be ready to serve requests. When the Auto Scaling group launches a new instance, it can attach the stopped EC2 instance from the warm pool. The instance can then be started up immediately, rather than having to wait for the data to be downloaded and processed. This reduces the overall startup time for the application.

The correct answer is C. Configuring AWS CloudTrail to send log data events to an Amazon CloudWatch Logs log group and creating a CloudWatch logs metric filter to match failed ConsoleLogin events is the simplest and most efficient way to monitor and alert on failed login attempts. Creating a CloudWatch alarm that is based on the metric filter and configuring an alarm action to send messages to the SNS topic will ensure that the security team is notified when multiple failed login attempts occur. This solution requires the least operational effort compared to the other options.

Option A is incorrect because it involves configuring AWS CloudTrail to send log management events instead of log data events. Log management events are used to track changes to CloudTrail configuration, such as creating, updating, or deleting a trail. Log data events are used to track API activity in AWS accounts, such as login attempts. Therefore, option A will not capture the failed ConsoleLogin events.

Option B is incorrect because it involves creating an Amazon Athena query and two Amazon EventBridge rules to monitor and alert on failed login attempts. This is a more complex and costly solution than using CloudWatch logs and alarms. Moreover, option B relies on the query returning a failure, which may not happen if the query is executed successfully but does not find any failed logins.

Option D is incorrect because it involves configuring AWS CloudTrail to send log data events to an Amazon S3 bucket and configuring an Amazon S3 event notification for the s3:ObjectCreated event type. This solution will not work because the s3:ObjectCreated event type does not allow filtering by ConsoleLogin failed events. The event notification will be triggered for any object created in the S3 bucket, regardless of the event type. Therefore, option D will generate a lot of false positives and unnecessary notifications.

AWS CloudTrail Log File Examples

Creating CloudWatch Alarms for CloudTrail Events: Examples

Monitoring CloudTrail Log Files with Amazon CloudWatch Logs

AWS Config offers a managed rule called CLOUDFORMATION_STACK_DRIFT_DETECTION_CHECK to detect stack drift automatically.

Creating an SNS topic and subscribing the DevOps lead enables simple notification without custom Lambda functions.

An EventBridge rule that triggers on NON_COMPLIANT status (when drift is detected) can send alerts directly to SNS.Option B adds complexity by requiring custom rules and Lambda. Option C incorrectly triggers on COMPLIANT, not NON_COMPLIANT. Option D needs a Lambda for email, while SNS can send email directly.Hence, Option A offers the least operational effort.

To meet the requirements, the DevOps engineer should do the following:

Turn on the Multi-AZ option on the Aurora cluster.

Update the application to use the Aurora cluster endpoint for write operations.

Update the Aurora cluster's reader endpoint for reads.

Turning on the Multi-AZ option will create a replica of the database in a different Availability Zone. This will ensure that the database remains available even if one of the Availability Zones is unavailable.

Updating the application to use the Aurora cluster endpoint for write operations will ensure that all writes are sent to both the primary and replica databases. This will ensure that the data is always consistent.

Updating the Aurora cluster's reader endpoint for reads will allow the application to read data from the replica database. This will improve the performance of the application during the maintenance window.

To restore the functionality of the Auto Scaling group after the AMI was deleted, the DevOps engineer needs to create a new AMI and update the Auto Scaling group to use it. The DevOps engineer can create a new AMI by copying the most recent public AMI of the operating system that the EC2 instances use. This will ensure that the new AMI has the same operating system as the custom AMI that was deleted. The DevOps engineer can then create a new launch template that uses the new AMI and update the Auto Scaling group to use the new launch template. This will allow the Auto Scaling group to launch new instances with the new AMI.

Option A is incorrect because creating an Amazon EventBridge rule that invokes an AWS Lambda function to query the applications on a 5-minute interval is not a valid solution. EventBridge rules can only trigger Lambda functions based on events, not on time intervals. Moreover, querying the applications on a 5-minute interval might incur unnecessary costs and network overhead, and might not detect performance issues in real time.

Option B is correct because creating an Amazon CloudWatch Synthetics canary that runs a custom script to query the applications on a 5-minute interval is a valid solution. CloudWatch Synthetics canaries are configurable scripts that monitor endpoints and APIs by simulating customer behavior. Canaries can run as often as once per minute, and can measure the latency and availability of the applications. Canaries can also send notifications to an Amazon SNS topic when they detect errors or performance issues1.

Option C is incorrect because creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS/ApplicationELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric is not a valid solution. The RequestCountPerTarget metric measures the number of requests completed or connections made per target in a target group2. This metric does not reflect the application response time, which is the requirement. Moreover, configuring the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the number of connections becomes greater than the configured number of threads that the application supports is not a valid way to measure the application performance, as it depends on the application design and implementation.

Option D is incorrect because creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS/ApplicationELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric is not a valid solution, for the same reason as option C. The RequestCountPerTarget metric does not reflect the application response time, which is the requirement. Moreover, configuring the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the average response time becomes greater than the longest response time that the application supports is not a valid way to measure the application performance, as it does not account for variability or outliers in the response time distribution.

To meet the requirements of migrating its on-premises Windows and Linux applications to AWS and creating a pilot light DR environment in another AWS Region, the company should use Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP for the application storage. Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP is a fully managed service that provides highly reliable, scalable, high-performing, and feature-rich file storage built on NetApp’s popular ONTAP file system. FSx for ONTAP supports multiple protocols, including SMB for Windows and NFS for Linux, so the company can access the shared storage from both types of applications. FSx for ONTAP also supports NetApp SnapMirror replication, which enables the company to replicate the storage to the DR Region. NetApp SnapMirror replication is efficient, secure, and incremental, and it preserves the data deduplication and compression benefits of FSx for ONTAP. The company can use automation to launch and configure the EC2 instances in the DR Region and then use NetApp SnapMirror to restore the data from the primary Region.

The other options are not correct because they do not meet the requirements or follow best practices. Using Amazon S3 for the application storage is not a good option because S3 is an object storage service that does not support SMB or NFS protocols natively. The company would need to use additional services or software to mount S3 buckets as file systems, which would add complexity and cost. Using Amazon EBS for the application storage is also not a good option because EBS is a block storage service that does not support SMB or NFS protocols natively. The company would need to set up and manage file servers on EC2 instances to provide shared access to the EBS volumes, which would add overhead and maintenance. Using a Volume Gateway in AWS Storage Gateway for the application storage is not a valid option because Volume Gateway does not support SMB protocol. Volume Gateway only supports iSCSI protocol, which means that only Linux applications can access the shared storage.

1: What is Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP? - FSx for ONTAP

2: Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP

3: Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP | NetApp

4: AWS Announces General Availability of Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP

Replicating Data with NetApp SnapMirror - FSx for ONTAP

What Is Amazon S3? - Amazon Simple Storage Service

What Is Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS)? - Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud

What Is AWS Storage Gateway? - AWS Storage Gateway