Pass the ISC 2 Credentials CISSP Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

 When implementing a data classification program, it is important to avoid too much granularity, because the process will require too many resources. Data classification is the process of assigning a level of sensitivity or criticality to data based on its value, impact, and legal requirements. Data classification helps to determine the appropriate security controls and handling procedures for the data. However, data classification is not a simple or straightforward process, as it involves many factors, such as the nature, context, and scope of the data, the stakeholders, the regulations, and the standards. If the data classification program has too many levels or categories of data, it will increase the complexity, cost, and time of the process, and reduce the efficiency and effectiveness of the data protection. Therefore, data classification should be done with a balance between granularity and simplicity, and follow the principle of proportionality, which means that the level of protection should be proportional to the level of risk.

The other options are not the main reasons to avoid too much granularity in data classification, but rather the potential challenges or benefits of data classification. It will be difficult to apply to both hardware and software is a challenge of data classification, as it requires consistent and compatible methods and tools for labeling and protecting data across different types of media and devices. It will be difficult to assign ownership to the data is a challenge of data classification, as it requires clear and accountable roles and responsibilities for the creation, collection, processing, and disposal of data. The process will be perceived as having value is a benefit of data classification, as it demonstrates the commitment and awareness of the organization to protect its data assets and comply with its obligations.

 When assigning ownership of an asset to a department, the most important factor is to ensure individual accountability for the asset. Individual accountability means that each person who has access to or uses the asset is responsible for its protection and proper handling. Individual accountability also implies that each person who causes or contributes to a security breach or incident involving the asset can be identified and held liable. Individual accountability can be achieved by implementing security controls such as authentication, authorization, auditing, and logging.

The other options are not as important as ensuring individual accountability, as they do not directly address the security risks associated with the asset. The department should report to the business owner is a management issue, not a security issue. Ownership of the asset should be periodically reviewed is a good practice, but it does not prevent misuse or abuse of the asset. All members should be trained on their responsibilities is a preventive measure, but it does not guarantee compliance or enforcement of the responsibilities.

The best description of the responsibilities of a data owner is determining the impact the information has on the mission of the organization. A data owner is a person or entity that has the authority and accountability for the creation, collection, processing, and disposal of a set of data. A data owner is also responsible for defining the purpose, value, and classification of the data, as well as the security requirements and controls for the data. A data owner should be able to determine the impact the information has on the mission of the organization, which means assessing the potential consequences of losing, compromising, or disclosing the data. The impact of the information on the mission of the organization is one of the main criteria for data classification, which helps to establish the appropriate level of protection and handling for the data.

The other options are not the best descriptions of the responsibilities of a data owner, but rather the responsibilities of other roles or functions related to data management. Ensuring quality and validation through periodic audits for ongoing data integrity is a responsibility of a data steward, who is a person or entity that oversees the quality, consistency, and usability of the data. Maintaining fundamental data availability, including data storage and archiving is a responsibility of a data custodian, who is a person or entity that implements and maintains the technical and physical security of the data. Ensuring accessibility to appropriate users, maintaining appropriate levels of data security is a responsibility of a data controller, who is a person or entity that determines the purposes and means of processing the data.

The passage of time is one of the factors that affects the classification of data. Data classification is the process of assigning a level of sensitivity or criticality to data based on its value, impact, and legal requirements. Data classification helps to determine the appropriate security controls and handling procedures for the data. However, data classification is not static, but dynamic, meaning that it can change over time depending on various factors. One of these factors is the passage of time, which can affect the relevance, usefulness, or sensitivity of the data. For example, data that is classified as confidential or secret at one point in time may become obsolete, outdated, or declassified at a later point in time, and thus require a lower level of protection. Conversely, data that is classified as public or unclassified at one point in time may become more valuable, sensitive, or regulated at a later point in time, and thus require a higher level of protection. Therefore, data classification should be reviewed and updated periodically to reflect the changes in the data over time.

The other options are not factors that affect the classification of data, but rather the outcomes or components of data classification. Assigned security label is the result of data classification, which indicates the level of sensitivity or criticality of the data. Multilevel Security (MLS) architecture is a system that supports data classification, which allows different levels of access to data based on the clearance and need-to-know of the users. Minimum query size is a parameter that can be used to enforce data classification, which limits the amount of data that can be retrieved or displayed at a time.

 When developing an information security management system (ISMS), an initial consideration is to understand the value of the information assets that the organization owns or processes. An information asset is any data, information, or knowledge that has value to the organization and supports its mission, objectives, and operations. Understanding the value of the information assets helps to determine the appropriate level of protection and investment for them, as well as the potential impact and consequences of losing, compromising, or disclosing them. Understanding the value of the information assets also helps to identify the stakeholders, owners, and custodians of the information assets, and their roles and responsibilities in the ISMS.

The other options are not initial considerations, but rather subsequent or concurrent considerations when developing an ISMS. Identifying the contractual security obligations that apply to the organizations is a consideration that depends on the nature, scope, and context of the information assets, as well as the relationships and agreements with the external parties. Identifying the level of residual risk that is tolerable to management is a consideration that depends on the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization, as well as the risk assessment and analysis of the information assets. Identifying relevant legislative and regulatory compliance requirements is a consideration that depends on the legal and ethical obligations and expectations of the organization, as well as the jurisdiction and industry of the information assets.

In a data classification scheme, the data is owned by the business managers. Business managers are the persons or entities that have the authority and accountability for the creation, collection, processing, and disposal of a set of data. Business managers are also responsible for defining the purpose, value, and classification of the data, as well as the security requirements and controls for the data. Business managers should be able to determine the impact the information has on the mission of the organization, which means assessing the potential consequences of losing, compromising, or disclosing the data. The impact of the information on the mission of the organization is one of the main criteria for data classification, which helps to establish the appropriate level of protection and handling for the data.

The other options are not the data owners in a data classification scheme, but rather the other roles or functions related to data management. System security managers are the persons or entities that oversee the security of the information systems and networks that store, process, and transmit the data. They are responsible for implementing and maintaining the technical and physical security of the data, as well as monitoring and auditing the security performance and incidents. Information Technology (IT) managers are the persons or entities that manage the IT resources and services that support the business processes and functions that use the data. They are responsible for ensuring the availability, reliability, and scalability of the IT infrastructure and applications, as well as providing technical support and guidance to the users and stakeholders. End users are the persons or entities that access and use the data for their legitimate purposes and needs. They are responsible for complying with the security policies and procedures for the data, as well as reporting any security issues or violations.

Asymmetric Card Authentication Key (CAK) challenge-response is an effective control in preventing electronic cloning of RFID based access cards. RFID based access cards are contactless cards that use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to communicate with a reader and grant access to a physical or logical resource. RFID based access cards are vulnerable to electronic cloning, which is the process of copying the data and identity of a legitimate card to a counterfeit card, and using it to impersonate the original cardholder and gain unauthorized access. Asymmetric CAK challenge-response is a cryptographic technique that prevents electronic cloning by using public key cryptography and digital signatures to verify the authenticity and integrity of the card and the reader. Asymmetric CAK challenge-response works as follows:

The card and the reader each have a pair of public and private keys, and the public keys are exchanged and stored in advance.

When the card is presented to the reader, the reader generates a random number (nonce) and sends it to the card.

The card signs the nonce with its private key and sends the signature back to the reader.

The reader verifies the signature with the card’s public key and grants access if the verification is successful.

The card also verifies the reader’s identity by requesting its signature on the nonce and checking it with the reader’s public key.

Asymmetric CAK challenge-response prevents electronic cloning because the private keys of the card and the reader are never transmitted or exposed, and the signatures are unique and non-reusable for each transaction. Therefore, a cloned card cannot produce a valid signature without knowing the private key of the original card, and a rogue reader cannot impersonate a legitimate reader without knowing its private key.

The other options are not as effective as asymmetric CAK challenge-response in preventing electronic cloning of RFID based access cards. Personal Identity Verification (PIV) is a standard for federal employees and contractors to use smart cards for physical and logical access, but it does not specify the cryptographic technique for RFID based access cards. Cardholder Unique Identifier (CHUID) authentication is a technique that uses a unique number and a digital certificate to identify the card and the cardholder, but it does not prevent replay attacks or verify the reader’s identity. Physical Access Control System (PACS) repeated attempt detection is a technique that monitors and alerts on multiple failed or suspicious attempts to access a resource, but it does not prevent the cloning of the card or the impersonation of the reader.

Identity as a Service (IDaaS) is the best contract in offloading the task of account management from the IT staff. IDaaS is a cloud-based service that provides identity and access management (IAM) functions, such as user authentication, authorization, provisioning, deprovisioning, password management, single sign-on (SSO), and multifactor authentication (MFA). IDaaS can help the organization to streamline and automate the account management process, reduce the workload and costs of the IT staff, and improve the security and compliance of the user accounts. IDaaS can also support the contractors who have limited onsite time, as they can access the organization’s resources remotely and securely through the IDaaS provider.

The other options are not as effective as IDaaS in offloading the task of account management from the IT staff, as they do not provide IAM functions. Platform as a Service (PaaS) is a cloud-based service that provides a platform for developing, testing, and deploying applications, but it does not manage the user accounts for the applications. Desktop as a Service (DaaS) is a cloud-based service that provides virtual desktops for users to access applications and data, but it does not manage the user accounts for the virtual desktops. Software as a Service (SaaS) is a cloud-based service that provides software applications for users to use, but it does not manage the user accounts for the software applications.

 Risk tolerance is the factor that mandates the amount and complexity of security controls applied to a security risk. Risk tolerance is the degree of risk that an organization or an individual is willing to accept or bear, based on their objectives, expectations, and capabilities. Risk tolerance can be influenced by various factors, such as the organizational culture, the regulatory environment, the stakeholder interests, the cost-benefit analysis, and the risk appetite. Risk tolerance can help to determine the acceptable level of residual risk and the appropriate risk response for each risk scenario. Security controls are the measures or actions that are implemented to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, or to transfer, avoid, or accept the risk. Security controls can be classified into different types, such as administrative, technical, physical, preventive, detective, corrective, deterrent, or compensating. Security controls can also be categorized into different levels, such as management, operational, or technical. The amount and complexity of security controls applied to a security risk depend on the risk tolerance of the organization or the individual, as well as the risk assessment results and the security requirements. Security vulnerabilities, risk mitigation, and security staff are not the factors that mandate the amount and complexity of security controls applied to a security risk, although they are related or relevant concepts. Security vulnerabilities are the weaknesses or flaws in the assets, systems, or processes that can be exploited by the threats to cause harm or damage. Security vulnerabilities can increase the risk level and the need for security controls. Risk mitigation is the process of selecting and implementing the appropriate security controls to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, or to transfer, avoid, or accept the risk. Risk mitigation is based on the risk tolerance and the risk assessment results. Security staff are the personnel who are responsible for planning, implementing, maintaining, and monitoring the security controls and processes within an organization. Security staff can affect the quality and effectiveness of the security controls. 

A source code escrow clause is a unique consideration that should be made part of the contractual agreement when purchasing a custom software product developed by a small vendor to support the business model. A source code escrow clause is a provision that requires the vendor to deposit the source code of the software product with a trusted third party, who will release it to the customer under certain conditions, such as the vendor’s bankruptcy, insolvency, or failure to provide maintenance or support. A source code escrow clause can help to mitigate the potential long-term risks associated with creating a dependency on a small vendor, such as losing access to the software product, being unable to fix bugs or vulnerabilities, or being unable to modify or update the software product. A right to request an independent review of the software source code, a due diligence form requesting statements of compliance with security requirements, and an access to the technical documentation are not unique considerations, but common ones that should be included in any software acquisition contract. References: CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 1: Security and Risk Management, page 65; Official (ISC)2 Guide to the CISSP CBK, Fifth Edition, Chapter 1: Security and Risk Management, page 57.

The best technique to address the threat of an imminent DDoS attack targeting a web application is to coordinate with and utilize the capabilities within the ISP. A DDoS attack is a malicious attempt to disrupt the normal traffic of a targeted server, service, or network by overwhelming the target or its surrounding infrastructure with a flood of Internet traffic. A DDoS attack can cause severe damage to the availability, performance, and reputation of the web application, as well as incur financial losses and legal liabilities. Therefore, it is important to have a DDoS mitigation strategy in place to prevent or minimize the impact of such attacks. One of the most effective ways to mitigate DDoS attacks is to leverage the capabilities of the ISP, as they have more resources, bandwidth, and expertise to handle large volumes of traffic and filter out malicious packets. The ISP can also provide additional services such as traffic monitoring, alerting, reporting, and analysis, as well as assist with the investigation and prosecution of the attackers. The ISP can also work with other ISPs and network operators to coordinate the response and share information about the attack. The other options are not the best techniques to address the threat of an imminent DDoS attack, as they may not be sufficient, timely, or scalable to handle the attack. Deploying load balancers, setting up web application firewalls, and implementing reverse web-proxies are some of the measures that can be taken at the application level to improve the resilience and security of the web application, but they may not be able to cope with the magnitude and complexity of a DDoS attack, especially if the attack targets the network layer or the infrastructure layer. Moreover, these measures may require more time, cost, and effort to implement and maintain, and may not be feasible to deploy in a short notice. References: What is a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack?; What is a DDoS Attack? DDoS Meaning, Definition & Types | Fortinet; Denial-of-service attack - Wikipedia.

The most significant security challenge when adopting DevOps practices compared to a more traditional control framework is maintaining segregation of duties. DevOps is a set of practices and methodologies that aim to integrate and automate the development and the operations of a system or a network, such as software, applications, or services, to enhance the quality and the speed of the delivery and the deployment of the system or the network. DevOps can provide some benefits for security, such as enhancing the performance and the functionality of the system or the network, preventing or mitigating some types of attacks or vulnerabilities, and supporting the audit and the compliance activities. DevOps can involve various tools and techniques, such as continuous integration, continuous delivery, continuous testing, continuous monitoring, or continuous feedback. A traditional control framework is a set of policies and procedures that aim to establish and enforce the security and the governance of a system or a network, such as software, applications, or services, to protect the confidentiality, the integrity, and the availability of the system or the network. A traditional control framework can provide some benefits for security, such as enhancing the visibility and the accountability of the system or the network, preventing or detecting any unauthorized or improper activities or changes, and supporting the audit and the compliance activities. A traditional control framework can involve various controls and mechanisms, such as risk assessment, change management, configuration management, access control, or audit trail. Maintaining segregation of duties is the most significant security challenge when adopting DevOps practices compared to a more traditional control framework, as it can be difficult and costly to implement and manage, due to the differences and the conflicts between the DevOps and the traditional control framework principles and objectives. Segregation of duties is a security principle or a technique that requires that different roles or functions are assigned to different parties, and that no single party can perform all the steps of a process or a task, such as development, testing, deployment, or maintenance. Segregation of duties can provide some benefits for security, such as enhancing the accuracy and the reliability of the process or the task, preventing or detecting fraud or errors, and supporting the audit and the compliance activities. 

The main purpose of a change management policy is to ensure that all changes made to the IT infrastructure are approved, documented, and communicated effectively across the organization. This helps to minimize the risks associated with unauthorized or poorly planned changes, such as security breaches, system failures, or compliance issues. A change management policy does not assure management that changes are necessary, identify the changes that may be made, or determine the necessity for implementing modifications, although these may be part of the change management process. References: CISSP CBK Reference

A Configuration Management Database (CMDB) is a database that stores information about configuration items (CIs) for use in change, release, incident, service request, problem, and configuration management processes. A CI is any component or resource that is part of a system or a network, such as hardware, software, documentation, or personnel. A CMDB can provide some benefits for security compliance audits, such as:

Reducing the time it takes to perform network, system, and application security compliance audits, by providing a centralized and updated source of information about the CIs, their attributes, their relationships, and their dependencies, which can help to identify and locate the CIs that are subject to the audit, and to avoid duplication or omission of the audit tasks.

Increasing the quality and effectiveness of the results of network, system, and application security compliance audits, by providing a consistent and accurate view of the current and historical state of the CIs, their compliance status, and their changes, which can help to verify and validate the compliance of the CIs with the policies and standards, and to detect and report any deviations or violations.

A source code repository, a configuration management plan (CMP), and a system performance monitoring application are not the best options to achieve the desired results of reducing the time and increasing the quality and effectiveness of network, system, and application security compliance audits, although they may be related or useful tools or techniques. A source code repository is a database or a system that stores and manages the source code of a software or an application, and that supports version control, collaboration, and documentation of the code. A source code repository can provide some benefits for security compliance audits, such as:

Reducing the time it takes to perform application security compliance audits, by providing a centralized and accessible source of information about the code, its versions, its changes, and its history, which can help to identify and locate the code that is subject to the audit, and to avoid duplication or omission of the audit tasks.

Increasing the quality and effectiveness of the results of application security compliance audits, by providing a consistent and accurate view of the current and historical state of the code, its compliance status, and its changes, which can help to verify and validate the compliance of the code with the policies and standards, and to detect and report any deviations or violations.

However, a source code repository is not the best option to achieve the desired results of reducing the time and increasing the quality and effectiveness of network, system, and application security compliance audits, as it is only applicable to the application layer, and it does not provide information about the other CIs that are part of the system or the network, such as hardware, documentation, or personnel. A configuration management plan (CMP) is a document or a policy that defines and describes the objectives, scope, roles, responsibilities, processes, and procedures of configuration management, which is the process of identifying, controlling, tracking, and auditing the changes to the CIs. A CMP can provide some benefits for security compliance audits, such as:

Reducing the time it takes to perform network, system, and application security compliance audits, by providing a clear and comprehensive guidance and direction for the configuration management activities, which can help to ensure the consistency and the efficiency of the configuration management process, and to avoid confusion or conflicts among the configuration management stakeholders.

Increasing the quality and effectiveness of the results of network, system, and application security compliance audits, by providing a framework and a standard for the configuration management activities, which can help to ensure the alignment and the compliance of the configuration management process with the policies and standards, and to support the audit and the compliance activities.

However, a CMP is not the best option to achieve the desired results of reducing the time and increasing the quality and effectiveness of network, system, and application security compliance audits, as it is not a database or a system that stores and provides information about the CIs, but rather a document or a policy that defines and describes the configuration management process. A system performance monitoring application is a software or a tool that collects and analyzes data and metrics about the performance and the behavior of a system or a network, such as availability, reliability, throughput, response time, or resource utilization. A system performance monitoring application can provide some benefits for security compliance audits, such as:

Reducing the time it takes to perform network and system security compliance audits, by providing a real-time and automated source of information about the performance and the behavior of the system or the network, which can help to identify and locate the issues or the problems that may affect the compliance of the system or the network, and to avoid manual or tedious audit tasks.

Increasing the quality and effectiveness of the results of network and system security compliance audits, by providing a quantitative and objective view of the performance and the behavior of the system or the network, which can help to measure and evaluate the compliance of the system or the network with the policies and standards, and to detect and report any anomalies or deviations.

However, a system performance monitoring application is not the best option to achieve the desired results of reducing the time and increasing the quality and effectiveness of network, system, and application security compliance audits, as it is only applicable to the network and system layers, and it does not provide information about the other CIs that are part of the system or the network, such as software, documentation, or personnel.

The minimum frequency for audits of permissions to individual or group accounts is continually. Audits of permissions are the processes of reviewing and verifying the user accounts and access rights on a system or a network, and ensuring that they are appropriate, necessary, and compliant with the policies and standards. Audits of permissions can provide some benefits for security, such as enhancing the accuracy and the reliability of the user accounts and access rights, identifying and removing any excessive, obsolete, or unauthorized access rights, and supporting the audit and the compliance activities. Audits of permissions should be performed continually, which means that they should be conducted on a regular and consistent basis, without any interruption or delay. Continual audits of permissions can help to maintain the security and the integrity of the system or the network, by detecting and addressing any changes or issues that may affect the user accounts and access rights, such as role changes, transfers, promotions, or terminations. Continual audits of permissions can also help to ensure the effectiveness and the feasibility of the audit process, by reducing the workload and the complexity of the audit tasks, and by providing timely and relevant feedback and results. Annually, to correspond with staff promotions, and to correspond with terminations are not the minimum frequencies for audits of permissions to individual or group accounts, although they may be related or possible frequencies. Annually means that the audits of permissions are performed once a year, which may not be sufficient or adequate to maintain the security and the integrity of the system or the network, as the user accounts and access rights may change or become outdated more frequently than that, due to various factors, such as role changes, transfers, promotions, or terminations. Annually audits of permissions may also increase the workload and the complexity of the audit process, as they may involve a large number of user accounts and access rights to review and verify, and they may not provide timely and relevant feedback and results. To correspond with staff promotions means that the audits of permissions are performed whenever a staff member is promoted to a higher or a different position within the organization, which may affect their user accounts and access rights. To correspond with staff promotions audits of permissions can help to ensure that the user accounts and access rights are aligned with the current roles or functions of the staff members, and that they follow the principle of least privilege. However, to correspond with staff promotions audits of permissions may not be sufficient or adequate to maintain the security and the integrity of the system or the network, as the user accounts and access rights may change or become outdated due to other factors, such as role changes, transfers, or terminations, and they may not be performed on a regular and consistent basis. To correspond with terminations means that the audits of permissions are performed whenever a staff member leaves the organization, which may affect their user accounts and access rights. To correspond with terminations audits of permissions can help to ensure that the user accounts and access rights are revoked or removed from the system or the network, and that they prevent any unauthorized or improper access or use. However, to correspond with terminations audits of permissions may not be sufficient or adequate to maintain the security and the integrity of the system or the network, as the user accounts and access rights may change or become outdated due to other factors, such as role changes, transfers, or promotions, and they may not be performed on a regular and consistent basis.