Pass the PMI Agile PMI-ACP Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

The correct answer is C – Request that the Product Owner include a spike in the next iteration's backlog so they can perform an initial investigation.

A spike is a time-boxed activity that allows teams to research or experiment to gain knowledge about technical or functional aspects of an upcoming feature or integration. Since the team lacks experience with the new component, using a spike will allow them to explore and reduce uncertainty before actual development begins.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Spikes are research activities that help teams gain the knowledge needed to reduce uncertainty and risk in upcoming stories.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Backlog Refinement)

Mike Griffiths writes:

“Spikes are used when the team is not confident about how to implement a story due to technical or domain uncertainty. Spikes help mitigate risk and inform estimation.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Other options are suboptimal:

A involves team extension, which contradicts Agile's preference for stable, cross-functional teams.

B is misaligned—technical investigation is a team responsibility, not the Product Owner's.

D avoids learning and may compromise solution quality.

Answer: C

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

The requirement for the home button to be recognizable is subjective and requires clarification from a design perspective. The team should consult the design team or subject matter experts (SMEs) who have expertise in user experience (UX) and interface design. These experts can provide specific guidelines or criteria for what constitutes a recognizable home button, such as color, shape, placement, or icons. This ensures that the team can create an appropriate, measurable test for the requirement.

The correct answer is D – Set up a meeting with the stakeholder to modify the working agreement and ensure future engagement.

Agile values regular collaboration with stakeholders. When a stakeholder becomes disengaged, the first step is to address it through open communication and mutual agreement. Revisiting or modifying the working agreement helps reset expectations and reestablish commitment in a collaborative and respectful way.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams work closely with stakeholders and set expectations through working agreements that are revisited and refined as necessary. These agreements include communication preferences and participation expectations.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 4.2 – Stakeholder Engagement)

Mike Griffiths reinforces this:

“Creating and maintaining stakeholder engagement requires ongoing alignment of goals and expectations. When participation drops, revisit agreements and reset expectations collaboratively.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 3 – Stakeholder Engagement)

Why the other options fall short:

A may help short-term but doesn’t address the root issue of misalignment or expectation gaps.

B comes across as directive rather than collaborative.

C escalates prematurely without attempting resolution directly with the stakeholder.

Answer: D

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

To assessprocess efficiency, agile teams usevalue stream mappingto identifywaste, delays, and non-value-adding steps. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.5 Process Analysis and Value Stream Mapping), value stream analysis helps determine how efficiently a process converts inputs into valuable outputs, making it ideal for supporting customer inquiries on operational performance.

Mike Griffiths (PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7: Continuous Improvement) reinforces the value of usingvalue stream mappingfor both software development processes and operational workflows to increase transparency and drive improvements.

Option Bis correct: reviewing thevalue streamprovides a structured way to evaluate efficiency.

Option AandDare important for team improvement and performance but don’t focus onprocess activity efficiency.

Option Crelates tovalue prioritization, not operational efficiency.

The burndown chart displayed shows two lines:

Adiagonal guideline (ideal trend line)representing the expected or planned burndown rate.

Aline with plotted black squaresrepresenting the actual progress of work completed during the iteration (typically in story points or hours).

The actual progress line (with black squares) staysconsistently abovethe ideal line throughout the iteration.

This indicates thatless work was completed than plannedat each point in time.

Toward the end of the iteration (around the 30th or 31st), the chart shows thatthe total remaining work does not reach zero—implyingincomplete workby the iteration’s end.

Analysis of the Chart:Interpretation According to Agile Standards:According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.4: Tracking Iteration Progress)andMike Griffiths' PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 6: Adaptive Planning):

A burndown chart that remainsabove the ideal lineanddoes not reach the baseline (zero)by the end of the iteration reflects that theteam is behind scheduleanddid not complete all planned work.

The burndown chart is a primaryinformation radiatorfor evaluating scope completion versus time and is a critical tool for monitoring iteration performance.

Therefore:

Option Cis correct:

"It trended behind schedule and did not complete everything on time."

Option Ais incorrect — the chart clearly shows a lag behind schedule.

Option Bis incorrect — there is no indication that the iteration time box was extended.

Option Dis incorrect — the team did not finish early or complete all tasks.

The role of a servant leader focuses on serving the team by removing obstacles, providing support, and ensuring that the team has what it needs to be successful. The agile coach is advising the project manager to adopt this mindset, which is central to Agile leadership. In this role, the project manager focuses on enabling the team’s success rather than taking a directive or authoritative approach.

The correct answer is C – Facilitate a retrospective to identify areas of improvement.

In Agile, mistakes are viewed as learning opportunities. The Scrum Master should create a safe environment where the team can reflect, discuss issues openly, and identify ways to prevent similar mistakes in the future.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Retrospectives provide a regular forum for teams to inspect and adapt. Teams discuss what went well, what didn’t, and how to improve. This supports continuous learning and performance enhancement.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.5 – Iteration Retrospectives)

Mike Griffiths states:

“Mistakes are inevitable; agile teams embrace them to improve. Retrospectives are essential for structured reflection and action planning.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7 – Continuous Improvement)

Why other options are less appropriate:

A may reinforce outdated or flawed processes.

B may help in quality control but does not address the mistake constructively.

D promotes fear and competition, which undermines team trust and collaboration.

Answer: C

The correct answer is D – Reestimate all stories including values for A, B, and C. Agile promotes empirical process control, meaning teams adapt based on what they learn. When significant deviations are found in actual effort vs. story point estimates, the team should revisit and refine their estimation process, including reestimating stories to better align with reality.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Estimates are revisited based on experience. Teams inspect and adapt during retrospectives, using data to improve future estimation accuracy.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Estimation and Planning)

Mike Griffiths writes:

“When estimates prove inaccurate, teams should reestimate affected stories. Estimating is a collaborative process, and learning from past deviations is a key part of adaptive planning.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Incorrect options:

A may distort estimation by comparison and not correct the root issue.

B manipulates velocity data and violates agile principles of transparency.

C attempts to “force fit” effort rather than inspect and adapt.

Answer: D

────────────────────────────────────

Delivering value in agile depends onfrequent prioritization and real-time feedback. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.1 Product Backlog and Prioritization), product owners and agile teams mustcontinuously reprioritize the backlogbased on changing stakeholder needs, market shifts, and feedback. Failure to do so can result in building the wrong product—even if it's "done."

Mike Griffiths (PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery) stresses thatvalue delivery is iterative and depends on current priorities, not static backlogs. It is vital that teams confirm that they're working on thehighest-value itemsbefore committing to a sprint.

Option Ais correct: proper backlog refinement and reprioritization ensures alignment with evolving stakeholder needs.

Option Bis an anti-pattern; agile welcomes change even late in development.

Option CandDare irrelevant or do not address the core issue of prioritization.

The correct answer is A – Use an information radiator to help increase the transparency of work for key stakeholders.

Information radiators (such as Kanban boards, burndown charts, and story maps) make work status visible to the entire team and stakeholders in real-time, improving communication without additional meetings or reporting overhead.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams use information radiators to promote transparency, show progress, and increase stakeholder engagement without adding administrative burden.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.5 – Information Radiators)

Mike Griffiths confirms:

“Effective agile environments display work status where everyone can see it. Visual indicators allow stakeholders and team members to remain informed without direct queries.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 5 – Agile Monitoring and Control)

Other options explained:

B creates unnecessary manual effort.

C may disrupt team rhythm; daily stand-ups are sufficient in Scrum.

D encourages siloed behavior and contradicts collaboration.

Answer: A

══════════════════════════════════════════════════