Pass the PMI Professional in Business Analysis PMI-PBA Questions and answers with ExamsMirror

Quality assurance is a function that involves applying quality standards and processes to ensure that the project or program meets the quality requirements and delivers the expected value to the stakeholders. Quality assurance also involves auditing the quality requirements and the results of quality control measurements to ensure that appropriate quality standards and operational definitions are being used. Quality assurance helps to prevent defects and errors, improve customer satisfaction, and enhance the credibility and reputation of the organization. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 10, Section 10.3.1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, Domain V: Evaluation, Task 3.

Tracing requirements is a technique that involves tracking the origin, dependencies, allocation, and status of each requirement throughout the project life cycle. Tracing requirements can help the business analyst to determine this issue before delivery by ensuring that each project objective is linked to one or more requirements, and that each requirement is verified and validated against the project objectives. Tracing requirements can also help to identify any missing, redundant, or conflicting requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 Plurality is the decision role that was used by the project team to decide which requirements will be included in the next release. Plurality means that the option with the most votes is selected, even if it does not have a majority (more than 50%) of the votes. Plurality is a decision role that can be used when there are more than two options and a quick decision is needed. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2.4; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 3.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a requirements traceability matrix is a tool that helps to ensure that the requirements are aligned with the business needs and objectives, and that they are verified and validated throughout the project life cycle. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to identify gaps, redundancies, and inconsistencies in the requirements. If the requirements matrix did not adequately track back to client requirements, it could result in a product that does not meet the client’s expectations or specifications, even if it passes the test plan. Therefore, it is important to establish and maintain a clear and accurate traceability of requirements from their source to their implementation and verification. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 179-180.

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

Problem tracking is a technique that helps the business analyst to manage and resolve issues identified by stakeholders with requirements. It involves creating a clear and concise record of each issue with its description, impact, priority, data, owner, status, and any other relevant information. It also involves tracking and managing the recorded issues until they are resolved. Problem tracking helps to ensure that issues are not neglected or abandoned, and that they are addressed in a timely and effective manner. Problem tracking also exposes the root causes of issues and helps to prevent recurrence of similar problems in the future. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

One benefit of documenting the change control process is that stakeholders know how to request changes. The change control process is a process that defines how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or requirements are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. Documenting the change control process helps to establish clear and consistent guidelines and procedures for managing changes and ensuring that they are aligned with the project objectives and stakeholder expectations. Documenting the change control process also helps to inform the stakeholders about how to request changes, what information and justification are required, who is responsible for reviewing and approving changes, and what criteria and methods are used for assessing the impact and value of changes. Stakeholders are not shielded from how changes are assessed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they are excluded or unaware of the change evaluation and decision making process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to increase transparency, collaboration, and communication among the stakeholders regarding changes. Stakeholders do not have a schedule of changes to be deployed by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a predetermined or fixed plan of when and how changes will be implemented. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to ensure that changes are implemented in a timely and effective manner based on their priority, feasibility, and dependency. Stakeholders do not understand the difficulty of managing requirements by documenting the change control process, as it implies that they have a negative or pessimistic view of the requirements management process. On the contrary, documenting the change control process helps to improve the quality and stability of the requirements and reduce ambiguity, confusion, or conflicts among the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 163-164; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 20.

 Acceptance criteria are the conditions that must be met for a solution or deliverable to be accepted by the stakeholders. Acceptance criteria should be measurable, testable, and clear, so that the team can verify if the requirements have been met or not. If the acceptance criteria for the requirements were not measurable, the team would have difficulty confirming if certain requirements have been met, as they would not have a clear and objective way to evaluate the solution or deliverable. The other options are not likely to cause this issue. The test engineer is not responsible for communicating requirements to the team, but for testing them against the acceptance criteria. Not all stakeholders need to be involved during requirements elicitation, as long as the key stakeholders who can provide relevant and accurate information are consulted. Requirements should be adequately reviewed with the project sponsor, but this does not affect the confirmation of meeting the requirements, as the sponsor is not the one who verifies them. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

 A matrix is a tool that can be used to record, organize, and track the requirements throughout the lifecycle of the project. A matrix can help the business analyst to identify the sources, dependencies, relationships, and attributes of the requirements, as well as to monitor their status, changes, and traceability. A matrix can also facilitate the communication, verification, and validation of the requirements with the stakeholders, and ensure their alignment with the business needs and objectives. A matrix can be updated and reviewed regularly to reflect the current state of the requirements and the solution, and to obtain the approval and acceptance from the stakeholders. A common example of a matrix is the Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM), which is a tool that links the requirements to the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and test cases12. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 92.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a critical design review is a formal review that occurs after the completion of the design phase of a project. The purpose of a critical design review is to verify that the design specification meets the requirements and that the solution is feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to the customer. A critical design review can help to establish an approved requirements baseline, which is a set of agreed-upon requirements that serves as a reference for further development and testing activities. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com